Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Distinctions between the two-state and sequential models for cooperative ligand binding.

R E Gibson, S A Levin

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
    |January 1, 1977
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Limiting Similarity, Species Packing, and System Stability for Hierarchical Competition-Colonization Models.

    The American naturalist·2018
    Same author

    Economic Incentives in the Socially Optimal Management of Infectious Disease: When [Formula: see text] is Not Enough.

    EcoHealth·2017
    Same author

    Implications of the spatial dynamics of fire spread for the bistability of savanna and forest.

    Journal of mathematical biology·2014
    Same author

    The changing status of authority figures.

    Journal of religion and health·2014
    Same author

    Ten 10-year trends for the future of healthcare: implications for academic health centers.

    Ochsner journal·2011
    Same author

    Human perspectives on the environment.

    Trends in ecology & evolution·2011

    The two-state and sequential models show distinct binding curves in Scatchard plots. The two-state model best describes acetylcholine receptor binding, differentiating between models for ligand binding.

    Area of Science:

    • Biochemistry
    • Molecular Biology
    • Pharmacology

    Background:

    • Ligand binding to receptors often exhibits cooperativity, influencing biological responses.
    • Distinguishing between different cooperativity models is crucial for understanding receptor function.
    • Scatchard plots are a common method for analyzing binding data.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare theoretical binding curves generated by two-state and sequential models for positive cooperativity.
    • To identify conditions that maximize the differences between these models.
    • To determine the most appropriate model for acetylcholine binding to solubilized acetylcholine receptors.

    Main Methods:

    • Theoretical analysis of binding curves derived from two-state and sequential models.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of Scatchard plot representations under various conditions.
  • Application of model selection criteria to experimental data of acetylcholine receptor binding.

    • Main Results:

    • Significant differences in theoretical binding curves were observed between the two-state and sequential models on Scatchard plots.
    • Specific conditions were identified where these model differences are most pronounced.
    • The two-state model was found to be superior for describing the binding of acetylcholine to receptors solubilized with Triton X-100 and sodium cholate.

    Conclusions:

    • The choice of cooperativity model significantly impacts the interpretation of ligand-receptor binding data.
    • Scatchard plot analysis under specific conditions can effectively differentiate between binding models.
    • The two-state model provides a better fit for acetylcholine binding to solubilized acetylcholine receptors.