Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 31, 2026

A High Throughput, Multiplexed and Targeted Proteomic CSF Assay to Quantify Neurodegenerative Biomarkers and Apolipoprotein E Isoforms Status
Published on: October 20, 2016
Use of amyloid-PET to determine cutpoints for CSF markers: A multicenter study
Marissa D Zwan1, Juha O Rinne2, Steen G Hasselbalch2
1From the Alzheimer Center & Department of Neurology (M.D.Z., F.H.B., P.J.V.) and Department of Clinical Chemistry (C.E.T.), Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, the Netherlands; Turku PET Centre and Department of Neurology (J.O.R.), University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Finland; Danish Dementia Research Centre (S.G.H.), Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of NVS (A.N., S.F.C.), Centre for Alzheimer Research, Translational Alzheimer Neurobiology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm; Department of Geriatric Medicine (A.N.), Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Memory Unit (A.L., J.F., R.B.), Department of Neurology, Hospital de Sant Pau, Barcelona; CIBERNED (A.L., J.F., R.B.), Center for Network Biomedical Research into Neurodegenerative Diseases, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain; Institute of Clinical Medicine-Neurology (S.-K.H., H.S., J.M.C.B.), University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio; Department of Clinical Physiology (I.L.), Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen; Department of Autoimmunology and Biomarkers (J.M.C.B.), Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark; Wolfson Molecular Imaging Centre (S.F.C.), Institute of Brain Behaviour and Mental Health, University of Manchester, UK; Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (B.N.M.v.B.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam; and Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology (P.J.V.), Maastricht University, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Alzheimer Center Limburg, Maastricht, the Netherlands. m.zwan@vumc.nl.
Objectives:
To define CSF β-amyloid 1-42 (Aβ42) cutpoints to detect cortical amyloid deposition as assessed by 11C-Pittsburgh compound B ([11C]PiB)-PET and to compare these calculated cutpoints with cutpoints currently used in clinical practice.
Methods:
We included 433 participants (57 controls, 99 with mild cognitive impairment, 195 with Alzheimer disease [AD] dementia, and 82 with non-AD dementia) from 5 European centers. We calculated for each center and for the pooled cohort CSF Aβ42 and Aβ42/tau ratio cutpoints for cortical amyloid deposition based on visual interpretation of [11C]PiB-PET images.
Results:
Amyloid-PET-based calculated CSF Aβ42 cutpoints ranged from 521 to 616 pg/mL, whereas existing clinical-based cutpoints ranged from 400 to 550 pg/mL. Using the calculated cutpoint from the pooled sample (557 pg/mL), concordance between CSF Aβ42 and amyloid-PET was 84%. Similar concordance was found when using a dichotomized Aβ42/tau ratio. Exploratory analysis showed that participants with a positive amyloid-PET and normal CSF Aβ42 levels had higher CSF tau and phosphorylated tau levels and more often had mild cognitive impairment or AD dementia compared with participants who had negative amyloid-PET and abnormal CSF Aβ42 levels.
Conclusions:
Amyloid-PET-based CSF Aβ42 cutpoints were higher and tended to reduce intercenter variability compared with clinical-based cutpoints. Discordant participants with normal CSF Aβ42 and a positive amyloid-PET may be more likely to have AD-related amyloid pathology than participants with abnormal CSF Aβ42 and a negative amyloid-PET.
Classification Of Evidence:
This study provides Class II evidence that an amyloid-PET-based CSF Aβ42 cutpoint identifies individuals with amyloid deposition with a sensitivity of 87% and specificity of 80%.

