Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 31, 2026

A Fibrin-Enriched and tPA-Sensitive Photothrombotic Stroke Model
Published on: June 4, 2021
Effect of Collaterals on Clinical Presentation, Baseline Imaging, Complications, and Outcome in Acute Stroke
E M Fanou1, J Knight1, R I Aviv2
1From the Division of Neuroradiology (E.M.F., J.K., R.I.A., S.-P.H., S.P.S., L.Z.), Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto and Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Insights
Good collateral circulation independently predicts better outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients. Combining collateral assessment with total ischemic volume improves prediction of final infarct size and functional outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Radiology
- Cardiovascular Research
Background:
- Collateral circulation on computed tomography angiography (CTA) is a known predictor of outcomes in acute ischemic stroke.
- The added benefit of collateral status over computed tomography perfusion (CTP)-derived total ischemic volume requires further evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the predictive value of collateral circulation.
- To determine the added benefit of collateral status compared to CTP-derived total ischemic volume.
- To evaluate prediction of baseline NIHSS score, total ischemic volume, hemorrhagic transformation, final infarct size, and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score >2.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective study of 395 acute ischemic stroke patients.
- Dichotomization based on recanalization status and collateral status.
- Quantification of clot burden score (CTA), total ischemic volumes (CTP), and final infarct size (CT/MRI).
- Univariate and multivariate analyses adjusting for rtPA status; model comparison using F or likelihood ratio tests.
Main Results:
- Collateral presence independently predicted outcomes, with greater benefit in recanalization-negative patients (16.5% variability for final infarct size, 19.2% for mRS >2).
- A combined model of collateral score and total ischemic volume was superior for predicting mRS >2 and final infarct size (24% and 28% variability, respectively).
- In recanalization-positive patients, the combined model showed a smaller, but significant, improvement for hemorrhagic transformation and final infarct prediction.
Conclusions:
- Collateral circulation is an independent predictor of outcomes in acute ischemic stroke.
- Its predictive significance is greater in recanalization-negative patients.
- Total ischemic volume assessment complements collateral scoring for predicting outcomes.
Background And Purpose:
Good CTA collaterals independently predict good outcome in acute ischemic stroke. Our aim was to evaluate the role of collateral circulation and its added benefit over CTP-derived total ischemic volume as a predictor of baseline NIHSS score, total ischemic volume, hemorrhagic transformation, final infarct size, and a modified Rankin Scale score >2.
Materials And Methods:
This was a retrospective study of 395 patients with stroke dichotomized by recanalization (recanalization positive/recanalization negative) and collateral status. Clot burden score was quantified on baseline CTA. Total ischemic volumes were derived from thresholded CTP maps. Final infarct size was assessed on follow-up CT/MRI. We performed uni-/multivariate analyses for each outcome, adjusting for rtPA status, using general linear (continuous variables) and logistic (binary variables) regression. Model comparison with collateral score and total ischemic volume was performed using the F or likelihood ratio test.
Results:
Collateral presence independently and inversely predicted all outcomes except hemorrhagic transformation in patients who were recanalization negative and mRS >2 in patients who were recanalization positive. The greatest collateral benefit occurred in patients who were recanalization negative, contributing 16.5% and 19.2% of the variability for final infarct size and mRS >2. The collateral score model is superior to the total ischemic volume for mRS >2 prediction, but a combination of total ischemic volume and collateral score is superior for mRS >2 and final infarct prediction (24% and 28% variability, respectively). In patients who were recanalization positive, a model including collateral score and total ischemic volume was superior to that of total ischemic volume for hemorrhagic transformation and final infarct prediction but was muted compared with patients who were recanalization negative (11.3% and 16.9% variability).
Conclusions:
Collateral circulation is an independent predictor of all outcomes, but the magnitude of significance varies, greater in patients who were recanalization negative versus recanalization positive. Total ischemic volume assessment is complementary to collateral score in many cases.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Imaging Studies VII: Vascular Imaging
Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies

