Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Psychologic preparation for cardiac catheterization.

K O Anderson1, F T Masur

  • 1Department of Psychology, Memphis State University.

Heart & Lung : the Journal of Critical Care
|March 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Clinical practice guidelines for chronic non-malignant pain syndrome patients.

Journal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation·2014
Same author

Guidelines for program evaluation in chronic non-malignant pain management.

Journal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation·2014
Same author

Symptom burden in patients undergoing autologous stem-cell transplantation.

Bone marrow transplantation·2007
Same author

Minority cancer patients and their providers: pain management attitudes and practice.

Cancer·2000
Same author

Work-related upper-extremity disorders and work disability: clinical and psychosocial presentation.

Journal of occupational and environmental medicine·1995
Same author

Survey of opioid use in chronic nonmalignant pain patients.

Regional anesthesia·1994
Same journal

Diagnosing heart failure through imaging.

Heart & lung : the journal of critical care·2026
Same journal

Comparative utility of median household income, social vulnerability index, and social deprivation index in predicting heart failure-related emergency department revisits: A multi-hospital cohort study.

Heart & lung : the journal of critical care·2026
Same journal

Predicting in-hospital mortality in AECOPD: A comparison of the mSOFA score with DECAF, Ottawa, and GOLD classifications.

Heart & lung : the journal of critical care·2026
Same journal

Diagnostic accuracy of serological tests and biomarkers for hypersensitivity pneumonitis: A systematic review.

Heart & lung : the journal of critical care·2026
Same journal

Associations of genetic risk factors and air pollution with incident pulmonary embolism: a prospective cohort study in the UK Biobank.

Heart & lung : the journal of critical care·2026
Same journal

Impaired hemostasis in mechanical circulatory support systems: Monitoring with T-TAS® 01, in vitro correction with VWF concentrates, and impact of membrane oxygenators.

Heart & lung : the journal of critical care·2026
See all related articles

Patient modeling effectively reduces anxiety during cardiac catheterization. This preparatory strategy helps patients feel less anxious and better cope with the invasive procedure.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Psychology
  • Medical Education

Background:

  • Cardiac catheterization is an invasive procedure causing significant patient anxiety.
  • Effective anxiety reduction strategies are crucial for patient adaptation and procedural outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficacy of four psychological preparatory strategies against an attention placebo control for reducing anxiety during cardiac catheterization.
  • To evaluate the impact of different preparatory interventions on patient adjustment and coping during the procedure.

Main Methods:

  • Sixty adult patients undergoing cardiac catheterization were randomly assigned to five groups: sensory-procedural information, modeling, cognitive-behavioral coping skills, modeling plus coping skills, or attention placebo control.
  • Anxiety and adaptation were assessed using self-report, behavioral, and physiological measures.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Patients in the modeling and modeling plus coping skills groups exhibited significantly lower anxiety ratings and better adjustment during the procedure compared to controls.
  • Subjects receiving modeling interventions reported less subjective anxiety and higher perceived coping abilities.
  • All preparatory treatment groups showed reduced autonomic arousal during and after the procedure compared to the control group.

Conclusions:

  • Psychological preparatory strategies, particularly those incorporating patient modeling, are effective in reducing anxiety and improving adaptation for cardiac catheterization.
  • The findings support the use of patient modeling as a valuable intervention to enhance patient experience and outcomes in invasive cardiac procedures.