Estimation of measurement uncertainty caused by surface gradient for a white light interferometer
Applied Optics
|October 20, 2015
Summary
This study introduces a new method to estimate measurement uncertainty in scanning white light interferometry caused by surface gradients. The validated method accurately predicts uncertainty, improving workpiece measurement reliability.
Area of Science:
- Metrology
- Optical Engineering
- Surface Metrology
Background:
- Scanning white light interferometry (SWLI) offers sub-nanometer resolution but suffers from measurement inaccuracies.
- Surface characteristics like roughness and gradient significantly impact SWLI measurement uncertainty.
- Existing methods struggle to precisely quantify uncertainty arising from steep surface gradients within a single pixel.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate a novel uncertainty estimation method for SWLI.
- To specifically address and quantify measurement uncertainty introduced by workpiece surface gradients.
- To provide a convenient tool for determining measurement uncertainty in SWLI.
Main Methods:
- Development of a mathematical uncertainty estimation model based on SWLI principles.
- Derivation and experimental verification of the proposed uncertainty model.
- Comparison of predicted uncertainty values with experimental measurements.
Main Results:
- The developed uncertainty estimation method effectively quantifies errors due to surface gradients.
- Experimental validation shows strong agreement between the model's predictions and actual measurement uncertainty.
- The method demonstrates high accuracy in predicting uncertainty caused by surface gradients.
Conclusions:
- The proposed method provides a reliable and convenient way to estimate SWLI measurement uncertainty.
- Accurate uncertainty quantification enhances the trustworthiness of SWLI measurements for critical applications.
- This work contributes to improving the overall accuracy and reliability of optical metrology techniques.
Related Concept Videos
Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments
55.8K
Counting is the type of measurement that is free from uncertainty, provided the number of objects being counted does not change during the process. Such measurements result in exact numbers. By counting the eggs in a carton, for instance, one can determine exactly how many eggs are there in the carton. Similarly, the numbers of defined quantities are also exact. For example, 1 foot is exactly 12 inches, 1 inch is exactly 2.54 centimeters, and 1 gram is exactly 0.001 kilograms. Quantities...
55.8K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
113.7K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.
113.7K
Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors
602
A survey team is tasked with determining the elevation difference between points Point A and Point B, separated by uneven terrain. They use a leveling instrument and a leveling rod.Common MistakesMisreading the Rod: During a backsight reading at Point A, the instrumentman observes the rod partially obscured by tall grass. Instead of reading 1.135 m, they mistakenly record 1.735 m due to the misalignment of the crosshair with the wrong graduation. This error adds 0.600 m to all subsequent...
602
Influence of Earth's Curvature and Atmospheric Refraction on Leveling
1.2K
During leveling, the Earth's curvature and atmospheric refraction introduce deviations in the line of sight from a true horizontal reference. When the line of sight is leveled, it remains perpendicular to the plumb line only at a single point. Beyond this, it deviates due to the Earth’s curvature, represented by the correction C. For a sight distance D, the deviation can be derived using the relationship:This relationship shows that the deviation increases quadratically with distance. Over a...
1.2K
Uncertainty: Overview
1.9K
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
1.9K
Distance Corrections
377
To achieve precise distance measurements, especially in surveying and construction, certain corrections must be applied to account for potential sources of error like the standardization errors, temperature variations, and slope adjustments.Standardization error emerges when measurement equipment undergoes changes, such as wear, repairs, or weather impacts. To address this, surveyors compare the equipment’s readings to a standard. This process identifies any deviation that might lead to...
377


