Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 31, 2026

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
The Malleability of Intertemporal Choice.
Karolina M Lempert1, Elizabeth A Phelps2
1New York University, 6 Washington Place, Room 890, New York, NY 10003, USA.
People’s decisions about future rewards are not fixed. Contextual factors like framing and emotional state significantly influence these intertemporal choices, making them adaptable.
Area of Science:
- Behavioral Economics
- Cognitive Psychology
- Neuroscience
Background:
- Intertemporal choices, decisions involving trade-offs between outcomes at different times, are fundamental to human behavior.
- Traditionally, individual patience or impulsivity was considered a stable trait.
- Emerging research suggests intertemporal choice is highly sensitive to contextual influences.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review evidence demonstrating the malleability of intertemporal choice.
- To identify key contextual factors influencing these decisions.
- To propose integrating these factors into existing choice models.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of studies on intertemporal decision-making.
- Analysis of framing effects, decision-maker states, and temporal construal.
- Examination of the role of affect and prospection.
Main Results:
- Choice framing, reference points, and time perception significantly alter preferences.
- Incidental emotions and future-oriented thinking (prospection) also impact choices.
- Evidence strongly supports the context-dependent nature of intertemporal decisions.
Conclusions:
- Intertemporal choice is not solely determined by stable individual traits but is profoundly influenced by context.
- Existing models should be updated to incorporate these contextual effects.
- Understanding these influences can guide interventions to promote beneficial decision-making.
Related Concept Videos
Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Timing and Consequences on Behavior
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
Framing Effects
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
Reason and Intuition
Woodward–Hoffmann Selection Rules and Microscopic Reversibility

