Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

High-resolution MR imaging with local coils.

J B Kneeland1, J S Hyde

  • 1Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee 53226.

Radiology
|April 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cheap calories, expensive nutrition?

British dental journal·2022
Same author

Meta-metallic coils and resonators: Methods for high Q-value resonant geometries.

The Review of scientific instruments·2016
Same author

On the Empirical Relation Between Spatial Ability and Sex Differences in Other Aspects of Cognitive Performance.

Multivariate behavioral research·2016
Same author

Hyperbolic-cosine waveguide tapers and oversize rectangular waveguide for reduced broadband insertion loss in W-band electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy.

The Review of scientific instruments·2011
Same author

Spin-label oximetry at Q- and W-band.

Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997)·2011
Same author

Coupling of Waveguide and Resonator by Inductive and Capacitive Irises for EPR Spectroscopy.

Applied magnetic resonance·2009
Same journal

Erratum for: Prediction of Lobar Emphysema Progression with a CT-Based Foundational Model.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

Erratum for: Associations of MRI-derived Paraspinal IMAT and LMM with Cardiometabolic Risk Factors: Results from a German Cohort.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

Erratum for: Blue Rubber Bleb Nevus Syndrome.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

Redefining the Clinical Role of MRI in Endometrial Cancer Staging.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

To Ablate or Not to Ablate: The Colorectal Liver Metastasis Question.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

The Limits of Radiologic Categorization in Pulmonary Nonsolid Nodules.

Radiology·2026
See all related articles

Radiologists should select the smallest MRI local coil that fits the field of view (FOV) and region of interest (ROI) for optimal image resolution and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Matching coil size to the anatomical area improves diagnostic accuracy.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Radiology
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

Background:

  • The selection of appropriate local coils is crucial for optimizing Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) performance.
  • Practicing radiologists require clear guidelines for choosing local coils to ensure diagnostic image quality.
  • Existing protocols may not sufficiently address the nuances of coil selection based on anatomical region and desired field of view (FOV).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To establish practical rules for selecting local coils in clinical MRI practice.
  • To guide radiologists in optimizing coil choice for improved image resolution and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR).
  • To enhance the diagnostic utility of MRI by ensuring appropriate coil selection for diverse anatomical regions.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Development of a set of evidence-based guidelines for local coil selection.
  • Consideration of factors including coil size, field of view (FOV), region of interest (ROI), and anatomical characteristics.
  • Analysis of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) trade-offs in relation to coil type (surface, whole-volume, partial-volume) and placement.

    • Main Results:

    • Smaller coils enable smaller FOVs and superior image resolution, recommending the smallest feasible coil size.
    • Optimal coil selection involves matching the coil's region of sensitivity (ROS) to the FOV dictated by the anatomical ROI.
    • Specific recommendations are provided for choosing between surface, whole-volume, and partial-volume coils based on anatomical location and desired signal characteristics.

    Conclusions:

    • Adherence to the proposed rules facilitates optimal local coil selection in clinical MRI.
    • Prioritizing smaller coils and matching them to the specific anatomical region and FOV enhances image quality.
    • Anatomical shape and positional variability may necessitate adjustments to coil choice beyond pure SNR considerations.