Outcome of Children with Standard-Risk T-Lineage Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia--Comparison among Different Treatment

Yousif Matloub1, Linda Stork2, Barbara Asselin3

  • 1Rainbow Babies & Children's Hospital, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.

Pediatric Blood & Cancer
|October 21, 2015
PubMed

Insights

Children with T-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) achieved similar survival rates across different treatment protocols. Less intensive chemotherapy without cranial irradiation proved effective for standard-risk T-ALL.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Oncology
  • Hematology
  • Leukemia Research

Background:

  • T-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) historically shows poorer outcomes than precursor-B acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL).
  • Risk stratification for childhood leukemia previously based on age and white blood cell (WBC) count, irrespective of immunophenotype.
  • Pediatric Oncology Group (POG) used more intensive protocols for T-ALL compared to Children's Cancer Group (CCG).

Purpose of the Study:

  • Compare outcomes for standard-risk (SR) T-ALL patients treated on CCG and POG trials.
  • Evaluate the effectiveness of different treatment intensities and cranial irradiation strategies.
  • Identify optimal treatment approaches for SR T-ALL.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of SR T-ALL patients from 1996-2005 on CCG (1952, 1991) and POG (9404) trials.
  • CCG regimens used a reduced-intensity Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster backbone with intensified treatment for slow responders.
  • POG regimen involved more intensive therapy and routine cranial irradiation for all patients.

Main Results:

  • No significant difference in 7-year event-free survival (EFS) between CCG and POG regimens (74.1-84.2%).
  • Comparable 7-year overall survival rates across all three treatment groups (86.1-89.1%).
  • CCG regimens achieved high EFS and survival with less intensive chemotherapy and no prophylactic cranial irradiation.

Conclusions:

  • All evaluated regimens achieved comparable high rates of EFS and long-term survival for SR T-ALL.
  • Less intensive chemotherapy backbone without prophylactic cranial irradiation is effective for SR T-ALL.
  • Treatment strategies can be refined for SR T-ALL, potentially reducing treatment burden.
Abstract