Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Microbial Growth Measurement: Indirect Methods01:27

Microbial Growth Measurement: Indirect Methods

2.3K
Estimating microbial growth is essential for understanding population dynamics and environmental adaptations. Indirect methods provide valuable insights by measuring parameters such as turbidity, metabolic activity, and biomass, enabling efficient and reproducible assessments.During exponential growth, microbial cells scatter light proportionally to their biomass, a principle used in turbidity measurements. About one million cells per milliliter produce detectable scattering, which a...
2.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Phenotypic traits related to methane emissions from Holstein dairy cows challenged by low or high forage proportion.

Journal of dairy science·2024
Same author

Effect of carbohydrate type in silages and concentrates on feed intake, enteric methane, and milk yield from dairy cows.

Journal of dairy science·2024
Same author

Gas exchange, rumen hydrogen sinks, and nutrient digestibility and metabolism in lactating dairy cows fed 3-nitrooxypropanol and cracked rapeseed.

Journal of dairy science·2023
Same author

Comparative methane estimation from cattle based on total CO<sub>2</sub> production using different techniques.

Animal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui)·2018
Same author

Prediction of enteric methane production, yield, and intensity in dairy cattle using an intercontinental database.

Global change biology·2018
Same author

Effect of spring versus autumn grass/clover silage and rapeseed supplementation on milk production, composition and quality in Jersey cows.

The Journal of dairy research·2016

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 31, 2026

The Use of an Automated System GreenFeed to Monitor Enteric Methane and Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Ruminant Animals
11:02

The Use of an Automated System GreenFeed to Monitor Enteric Methane and Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Ruminant Animals

Published on: September 7, 2015

23.4K

Methods for Measuring and Estimating Methane Emission from Ruminants.

Ida M L D Storm1, Anne Louise F Hellwing2, Nicolaj I Nielsen3

  • 1Department of Large Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Grønnegårdsvej 2, DK-1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark. imld@life.ku.dk.

Animals : an Open Access Journal From MDPI
|October 22, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Quantifying enteric methane emissions in ruminants requires understanding various methods, including chambers, SF₆, and in vitro techniques. Knowledge of each method's pros and cons aids experimental design and result interpretation for accurate methane emission data.

Keywords:
estimation methodslimitationsmethaneruminants

More Related Videos

Design and Use of a Full Flow Sampling System FFS for the Quantification of Methane Emissions
08:18

Design and Use of a Full Flow Sampling System FFS for the Quantification of Methane Emissions

Published on: June 12, 2016

17.5K
Lab-Scale Model to Evaluate Odor and Gas Concentrations Emitted by Deep Bedded Pack Manure
06:52

Lab-Scale Model to Evaluate Odor and Gas Concentrations Emitted by Deep Bedded Pack Manure

Published on: July 19, 2018

7.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 31, 2026

The Use of an Automated System GreenFeed to Monitor Enteric Methane and Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Ruminant Animals
11:02

The Use of an Automated System GreenFeed to Monitor Enteric Methane and Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Ruminant Animals

Published on: September 7, 2015

23.4K
Design and Use of a Full Flow Sampling System FFS for the Quantification of Methane Emissions
08:18

Design and Use of a Full Flow Sampling System FFS for the Quantification of Methane Emissions

Published on: June 12, 2016

17.5K
Lab-Scale Model to Evaluate Odor and Gas Concentrations Emitted by Deep Bedded Pack Manure
06:52

Lab-Scale Model to Evaluate Odor and Gas Concentrations Emitted by Deep Bedded Pack Manure

Published on: July 19, 2018

7.0K

Area of Science:

  • Agricultural Science
  • Environmental Science
  • Animal Science

Background:

  • Enteric methane emission from ruminants is a significant contributor to greenhouse gases.
  • Accurate quantification is crucial for environmental impact assessments and mitigation strategies.
  • Understanding different measurement techniques is vital for reliable data generation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a comprehensive overview of methods for quantifying enteric methane emission in ruminants.
  • To detail the principles, advantages, and disadvantages of established and emerging techniques.
  • To guide researchers in selecting appropriate methods for their experimental needs.

Main Methods:

  • Description of established methods: respiration chambers, sulfur hexafluoride (SF₆) tracer technique, and in vitro gas production.
  • Discussion of newer techniques, including CO₂-based methods and model estimations.
  • Brief mention of developing methods: micrometeorological technique, combined feeder and CH₄ analyzer, and proxy methods.

Main Results:

  • Established methods offer varying degrees of accuracy and practicality.
  • Newer and developing methods aim to improve efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and on-farm applicability.
  • Model estimations provide insights into national budgets and individual animal emissions based on diet.

Conclusions:

  • The choice of method for enteric methane quantification depends on experimental objectives, resources, and expertise.
  • A thorough understanding of method-specific advantages and disadvantages enhances experimental planning and result interpretation.
  • Informed method selection and interpretation are key to advancing research on ruminant methane emissions.