Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 31, 2026

A Thrombotic Stroke Model Based On Transient Cerebral Hypoxia-ischemia
Published on: August 18, 2015
Ticlopidine aspirin stroke study: Outcome by vascular distribution of the qualifying event
1From the Division of Neurology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada.
Insights
Ticlopidine reduced stroke risk more effectively than aspirin in carotid circulation events. While ticlopidine had more adverse events, serious risks were similar between the two stroke prevention medications.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Stroke remains a leading cause of death and disability worldwide.
- Identifying effective antiplatelet therapies is crucial for secondary stroke prevention.
- The Ticlopidine Aspirin Stroke Study (TASS) investigated the efficacy of ticlopidine versus aspirin.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effectiveness of ticlopidine and aspirin in preventing recurrent stroke and death.
- To analyze outcomes based on the vascular distribution of the initial ischemic event (carotid vs. vertebrobasilar).
Main Methods:
- Analysis of patient data from the Ticlopidine Aspirin Stroke Study (TASS).
- Stratification of outcomes by vascular territory: carotid circulation and vertebrobasilar circulation.
- Comparison of 1-year risk reduction for death or nonfatal stroke and fatal or nonfatal stroke.
Main Results:
- Ticlopidine demonstrated a 49.7% risk reduction for fatal or nonfatal stroke in the carotid circulation compared to aspirin.
- In the vertebrobasilar circulation, ticlopidine showed a 46% risk reduction, though not statistically significant (NS).
- Overall stroke risk reduction was 24.6% for carotid events and 28.0% for vertebrobasilar events with ticlopidine.
Conclusions:
- Ticlopidine is a more effective agent than aspirin for secondary stroke prevention in patients with carotid artery disease.
- While ticlopidine use was associated with a higher incidence of overall adverse events, serious or life-threatening events were comparable to aspirin.
- The findings support ticlopidine as a valuable therapeutic option, particularly for carotid circulation ischemic events.
Abstract:
Outcomes from the Ticlopidine Aspirin Stroke Study (TASS) population stratified by the vascular distribution of the qualifying ischemic event are described. Among patients having a qualifying event in the carotid circulation, the 1-year risk reduction for death or nonfatal stroke was 49% and for fatal or nonfatal stroke was 49.7% for ticlopidine versus aspirin. For those with a vertebrobasilar distribution, the 1-year risk reductions for death or nonfatal stroke and fatal or nonfatal stroke were 22% and 46% (NS), respectively, for ticlopidine relative to aspirin. The overall risk reduction for fatal or nonfatal stroke was 24.6% (1.35, 42.4; p = 0.039) for an event in the carotid distribution and 28.0% (-20.6, 57.0; p = 0.211) for one in the vertebrobasilar distribution. The incidence of adverse events was greater in the ticlopidine group (40% versus 28%); however, the incidence of serious or life-threatening adverse events was similar (1.4% with ticlopidine and 1.5% with aspirin.
Related Concept Videos
Antiplatelet Drugs: Prostaglandin Synthesis, P2Y12 and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors
Prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors, exemplified by the widely known aspirin, wield their power by irreversibly acetylating...
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care

