Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 31, 2026

Author Spotlight: Exploring Cellular Processes by Modeling Ligands in Cryo-EM Maps
Published on: July 19, 2024
Integration of Ligand and Structure Based Approaches for CSAR-2014
Philip Prathipati1, Kenji Mizuguchi1
1National Institutes of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition , 7-6-8 Saito-Asagi, Ibaraki City, Osaka 567-0085, Japan.
Abstract:
The prediction of binding poses and affinities is an area of active interest in computer-aided drug design (CADD). Given the documented limitations with either ligand or structure based approaches, we employed an integrated approach and developed a rapid protocol for binding mode and affinity predictions. This workflow was applied to the three protein targets of Community Structure-Activity Resource-2014 (CSAR-2014) exercise: Factor Xa (FXa), Spleen Tyrosine Kinase (SYK), and tRNA (guanine-N(1))-methyltransferase (TrmD). Our docking and scoring workflow incorporates compound clustering and ligand and protein structure based pharmacophore modeling, followed by local docking, minimization, and scoring. While the former part of the protocol ensures high-quality ligand alignments and mapping, the subsequent minimization and scoring provides the predicted binding modes and affinities. We made blind predictions of docking pose for 1, 5, and 14 ligands docked into 1, 2, and 12 crystal structures of FXa, SYK, and TrmD, respectively. The resulting 174 poses were compared with cocrystallized structures (1, 5, and 14 complexes) made available at the end of CSAR. Our predicted poses were related to the experimentally determined structures with a mean root-mean-square deviation value of 3.4 Å. Further, we were able to classify high and low affinity ligands with the area under the curve values of 0.47, 0.60, and 0.69 for FXa, SYK, and TrmD, respectively, indicating the validity of our approach in at least two of the three systems. Detailed critical analysis of the results and CSAR methodology ranking procedures suggested that a straightforward application of our workflow has limitations, as some of the performance measures do not reflect the actual utility of pose and affinity predictions in the biological context of individual systems.
More Related Videos
10:29Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Activity Prediction, and Molecular Dynamics of Non-nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
Published on: May 9, 2025
05:50Pharmacophore Modeling for Targets with Extensive Ligand Libraries: A Case Study on SARS-CoV-2 Mpro
Published on: September 26, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Ligand Binding Sites
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
Ligand Binding Sites
Structure-Activity Relationships and Drug Design
SAR studies the intricate relationship between a drug's chemical structure and biological activity. It focuses on understanding how modifications to a drug's structure can influence...
Ligand Binding and Linkage
Ligand Binding and Linkage
Crystal Field Theory - Octahedral Complexes
To explain the observed behavior of transition metal complexes (such as colors), a model involving electrostatic interactions between the electrons from the ligands and the electrons in the unhybridized d orbitals of the central metal atom has been developed. This electrostatic model is crystal field theory (CFT). It helps to understand, interpret, and predict the colors, magnetic behavior, and some structures of coordination compounds of transition metals.
CFT focuses on...