Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ligand Binding Sites02:40

Ligand Binding Sites

15.8K
Proteins are dynamic macromolecules that carry out a wide variety of essential processes; however, the activities of most proteins depend on their interactions with other molecules or ions, known as ligands.
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
15.8K
Ligand Binding Sites02:40

Ligand Binding Sites

9.1K
9.1K
Ligand Binding and Linkage00:49

Ligand Binding and Linkage

6.0K
Allosteric proteins have more than one ligand binding site; the binding of a ligand to any of these sites influences the binding of ligands to the other sites. When a protein is allosteric, its binding sites are called coupled or linked.  In the case of enzymes, the site that binds to the substrate is known as the active site and the other site is known as the regulatory site. When a ligand binds to the regulatory site, this leads to conformational changes in the protein that can influence...
6.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Discovery of KDX1381, a Bivalent CK2α Inhibitor for the Treatment of Solid Tumors as a Single Agent or in Combination.

Journal of medicinal chemistry·2025
Same author

Picomolar bivalent inhibitors of protein kinase CK2 active against β-coronavirus replication.

European journal of medicinal chemistry·2025
Same author

Rational Design and Synthesis of Highly Stable Haloflavanone DNA Methyltransferase Inhibitors Inducing Tumor Suppressor Gene Re-expression in Cancer Cells.

Journal of medicinal chemistry·2025
Same author

Development of ultra-miniaturized weak affinity chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry as a high throughput fragment screening method against wild-type and purified membrane proteins embedded in biomimetic membranes.

Analytica chimica acta·2025
Same author

Micromolar Concentration Affinity Study on a Benchtop NMR Spectrometer with Secondary <sup>13</sup>C Labeled Hyperpolarized Ligands.

ACS omega·2025
Same author

Binding-Site Switch for Protein Kinase CK2 Inhibitors.

ChemMedChem·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 31, 2026

NMR-Based Fragment Screening in a Minimum Sample but Maximum Automation Mode
09:19

NMR-Based Fragment Screening in a Minimum Sample but Maximum Automation Mode

Published on: June 4, 2021

4.0K

Ligand-Orientation Based Fragment Selection in STD NMR Screening.

Olivier Cala1, Isabelle Krimm1

  • 1Institut des Sciences Analytiques, UMR5280 CNRS, Université Lyon 1, Ecole Nationale Supérieure de Lyon, Université de Lyon , 5 rue de la Doua Villeurbanne 69100, France.

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
|October 23, 2015
PubMed
Summary

Quantitative saturation transfer difference (STD) analysis reliably distinguishes specific protein binders from nonspecific ones. This NMR method enables fragment selection based on binding mode, even without protein structural data.

More Related Videos

Nano-Differential Scanning Fluorimetry for Screening in Fragment-based Lead Discovery
06:26

Nano-Differential Scanning Fluorimetry for Screening in Fragment-based Lead Discovery

Published on: May 16, 2021

5.7K
Workflow and Tools for Crystallographic Fragment Screening at the Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin
06:29

Workflow and Tools for Crystallographic Fragment Screening at the Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin

Published on: March 3, 2021

6.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 31, 2026

NMR-Based Fragment Screening in a Minimum Sample but Maximum Automation Mode
09:19

NMR-Based Fragment Screening in a Minimum Sample but Maximum Automation Mode

Published on: June 4, 2021

4.0K
Nano-Differential Scanning Fluorimetry for Screening in Fragment-based Lead Discovery
06:26

Nano-Differential Scanning Fluorimetry for Screening in Fragment-based Lead Discovery

Published on: May 16, 2021

5.7K
Workflow and Tools for Crystallographic Fragment Screening at the Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin
06:29

Workflow and Tools for Crystallographic Fragment Screening at the Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin

Published on: March 3, 2021

6.1K

Area of Science:

  • Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) Spectroscopy
  • Biophysical Chemistry
  • Fragment-Based Drug Discovery

Background:

  • Saturation Transfer Difference (STD) NMR is a common technique for screening potential protein-binding ligands.
  • Validating specific binders identified by STD often necessitates additional experiments like competition assays or orthogonal biophysical methods.
  • The absence of protein structural data can complicate the interpretation of ligand binding specificity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To demonstrate that quantitative STD analysis can reliably differentiate specific from nonspecific ligands.
  • To establish quantitative STD as a robust method for selecting protein-binding fragments.
  • To show that this approach can identify fragments with privileged binding modes without requiring protein structural information.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing quantitative analysis of saturation transfer difference (STD) NMR data.
  • Applying the method to discriminate between specific and nonspecific ligand interactions with proteins.
  • Evaluating the selection of fragments based on binding mode in the absence of structural data.

Main Results:

  • Quantitative STD analysis proved to be a reliable and robust method for distinguishing specific ligands.
  • The approach successfully discriminated between specific and nonspecific interactions.
  • Fragments were selected based on binding modes, even without prior knowledge of the protein structure.

Conclusions:

  • Quantitative STD NMR analysis is a powerful tool for identifying specific protein-ligand interactions.
  • This method allows for the selection of fragments with privileged binding modes, simplifying screening processes.
  • The technique is effective even when no structural information about the target protein is available.