Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 31, 2026

05:57
Novel Object Recognition and Object Location Behavioral Testing in Mice on a Budget
Published on: November 20, 2018
59.8K
Catching objects thrown to oneself: Testing control strategies for object interception in a novel domain
Perception
|October 24, 2015
Summary
Researchers explored object interception strategies by having participants launch objects to themselves. Controlling optical velocity proved most effective for catching, suggesting a unified strategy for self- and other-launched objects.
Area of Science:
- Human motor control
- Perception-action coupling
- Biomechanics
Background:
- Extensive research exists on intercepting externally launched objects (e.g., baseballs).
- Previous studies focused on objects thrown from distances of 10-50m.
- Debate continues regarding the most generalizable interception strategy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate object interception in a novel self-launching scenario.
- To determine the most effective strategy for catching self-launched objects.
- To compare self-launching interception with traditional externally-launched scenarios.
Main Methods:
- Participants intercepted objects they launched to themselves.
- Analysis focused on catcher ground movements and optical trajectories.
- A strategy based on controlling optical velocity was tested.
Main Results:
- The optical velocity control strategy best explained observed catching movements.
- This strategy involves minimizing the object's optical velocity (keeping it at zero).
- The findings align with previous research on externally launched objects.
Conclusions:
- Optical velocity control is a highly effective strategy for intercepting self-launched objects.
- This strategy offers a unified explanation for both self- and other-launched object interception.
- Further research can refine understanding of perception-action in dynamic tasks.
Related Concept Videos
Collisions in Multiple Dimensions: Problem Solving
5.7K
In multiple dimensions, the conservation of momentum applies in each direction independently. Hence, to solve collisions in multiple dimensions, we should write down the momentum conservation in each direction separately. To help understand collisions in multiple dimensions, consider an example.
A small car of mass 1,200 kg traveling east at 60 km/h collides at an intersection with a truck of mass 3,000 kg traveling due north at 40 km/h. The two vehicles are locked together. What is the...
A small car of mass 1,200 kg traveling east at 60 km/h collides at an intersection with a truck of mass 3,000 kg traveling due north at 40 km/h. The two vehicles are locked together. What is the...
5.7K
Types of Collisions - II
10.4K
When two or more objects collide with each other, they can stick together to form one single composite object (after collision). The total mass of the object after the collision is the sum of the masses of the original objects, and it moves with a velocity dictated by the conservation of momentum. Although the system's total momentum remains constant, the kinetic energy decreases, and thus such a collision is an inelastic collision. Most of the collisions between objects in daily life are...
10.4K
Collisions in Multiple Dimensions: Introduction
7.3K
It is far more common for collisions to occur in two dimensions; that is, the initial velocity vectors are neither parallel nor antiparallel to each other. Let's see what complications arise from this. The first idea is that momentum is a vector. Like all vectors, it can be expressed as a sum of perpendicular components (usually, though not always, an x-component and a y-component, and a z-component if necessary). Thus, when the statement of conservation of momentum is written for a...
7.3K
Types Of Collisions - I
9.7K
When two objects come in direct contact with each other, it is called a collision. During a collision, two or more objects exert forces on each other in a relatively short amount of time. A collision can be categorized as either an elastic or inelastic collision. If two or more objects approach each other, collide and then bounce off, moving away from each other with the same relative speed at which they approached each other, the total kinetic energy of the system is said to be conserved. This...
9.7K
Masking and Demasking Agents
4.0K
EDTA titrations may necessitate masking and demasking agents to temporarily protect a particular metal ion in a mixture from the EDTA reaction. These agents facilitate the sequential analysis of the metal ions by forming stable complexes with some—but not all—metal ions during certain steps.
There are many masking agents, such as cyanide, fluoride, triethanolamine, thiourea, and 2,3-bis(sulfanyl)propan-1-ol (formerly 2,3-dimercapto-1-propanol), with the masking agent chosen based on...
There are many masking agents, such as cyanide, fluoride, triethanolamine, thiourea, and 2,3-bis(sulfanyl)propan-1-ol (formerly 2,3-dimercapto-1-propanol), with the masking agent chosen based on...
4.0K
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
545
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
545

