Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Viral Mutations00:36

Viral Mutations

40.8K
A mutation is a change in the sequence of bases of DNA or RNA in a genome. Some mutations occur during replication of the genome due to errors made by the polymerase enzymes that replicate DNA or RNA. Unlike DNA polymerase, RNA polymerase is prone to errors because it is not capable of “proofreading” its work. Viruses with RNA-based genomes, like HIV, therefore accrue mutations faster than viruses with DNA-based genomes. Because mutation and recombination provide the raw material...
40.8K
Mismatch Repair01:20

Mismatch Repair

7.0K
Organisms are capable of detecting and fixing nucleotide mismatches that occur during DNA replication. This sophisticated process requires identifying the new strand and replacing the erroneous bases with correct nucleotides. Mismatch repair is coordinated by many proteins in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes.
The Mutator Protein Family Plays a Key Role in DNA Mismatch Repair
The human genome has more than 3 billion base pairs of DNA per cell. Prior to cell division, that vast amount of genetic...
7.0K
Mismatch Repair01:36

Mismatch Repair

45.1K
Overview
45.1K
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons02:54

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

7.2K
Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...
7.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The 2026 global roadmap for textile-integrated wearable technologies in health.

Physiological measurement·2026
Same author

Shotgun metagenomic profiling reveals ecological and functional alterations of the oral microbiome in craniosynostosis.

Journal of oral microbiology·2026
Same author

Interpretable graph-based models on multimodal biomedical data integration: a technical review and benchmarking.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

From tooth to gut: Proteomic evidence of systemic dysregulation in fluorosis.

Ecotoxicology and environmental safety·2026
Same author

Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Dentistry: A Systematic Review of Its Trust and Translation.

International dental journal·2026
Same author

Comprehensive evaluation of ACMG/AMP-based variant classification tools.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 31, 2026

Isolation of Fidelity Variants of RNA Viruses and Characterization of Virus Mutation Frequency
18:10

Isolation of Fidelity Variants of RNA Viruses and Characterization of Virus Mutation Frequency

Published on: June 16, 2011

30.2K

A method to avoid errors associated with the analysis of hypermutated viral sequences by alignment-based methods.

Hamid Alinejad-Rokny1, Diako Ebrahimi2

  • 1Infection Analytics, Kirby Institute, UNSW Australia, Sydney, Australia.

Journal of Biomedical Informatics
|October 24, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

APOBEC3 editing enzymes cause G-to-A hypermutation in viral genomes. Insertions/deletions (indels) disrupt sequence alignment, leading to misidentification of APOBEC3 targets and flawed biological conclusions.

Keywords:
APOBEC3AlignmentHypermutationIndels (insertions/deletions)Viral sequences

More Related Videos

Amplification of Near Full-length HIV-1 Proviruses for Next-Generation Sequencing
10:18

Amplification of Near Full-length HIV-1 Proviruses for Next-Generation Sequencing

Published on: October 16, 2018

12.8K
Using Phylogenetic Analysis to Investigate Eukaryotic Gene Origin
08:57

Using Phylogenetic Analysis to Investigate Eukaryotic Gene Origin

Published on: August 14, 2018

16.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 31, 2026

Isolation of Fidelity Variants of RNA Viruses and Characterization of Virus Mutation Frequency
18:10

Isolation of Fidelity Variants of RNA Viruses and Characterization of Virus Mutation Frequency

Published on: June 16, 2011

30.2K
Amplification of Near Full-length HIV-1 Proviruses for Next-Generation Sequencing
10:18

Amplification of Near Full-length HIV-1 Proviruses for Next-Generation Sequencing

Published on: October 16, 2018

12.8K
Using Phylogenetic Analysis to Investigate Eukaryotic Gene Origin
08:57

Using Phylogenetic Analysis to Investigate Eukaryotic Gene Origin

Published on: August 14, 2018

16.7K

Area of Science:

  • Genetics
  • Molecular Biology
  • Virology

Background:

  • The APOBEC3 (apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme, catalytic polypeptide-like3) family comprises human editing enzymes.
  • These enzymes induce G-to-A changes, termed "hypermutation," in viral genomes like HIV, SIV, HBV, and endogenous retroviruses.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of sequence variations on APOBEC3 hypermutation analysis.
  • To identify potential sources of error in identifying APOBEC3-targeted sites.

Main Methods:

  • Sequence alignment analysis.
  • Evaluation of APOBEC3 editing patterns in the presence of indels.

Main Results:

  • Insertions/deletions (indels) in sequences lead to incorrect assignment of APOBEC3 targeted and non-target sites.
  • This misassignment can result in the incorrect identification of hypermutated sequences.

Conclusions:

  • Indels pose a significant challenge to accurate APOBEC3 hypermutation analysis.
  • Erroneous biological inferences can arise from hypermutation data affected by indels, necessitating careful sequence analysis.