Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Genetic Screens

Genetic Screens

Genetic screens are tools used to identify genes and mutations responsible for phenotypes of interest. Genetic screens help identify individuals or a group of people at risk of developing genetic diseases and help them with early intervention, targeted therapy, and reproductive options.
Forward genetic screens
Forward or “classical” genetic screens involve creating random mutations in an organism’s DNA using radiation, mutagens, or insertion of additional bases, which...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

The SLC15A4-LAMTOR1 interaction licenses endolysosomal TLR-mediated mTOR signaling and inflammatory cytokine production.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Same author

Author Correction: Posttranslational modifications remodel proteome-wide ligandability.

Nature chemical biology·2026

Same author

Genetic and pharmacological inactivation of peptidoglycan remodeling increases antibiotic susceptibility of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium.

Nature communications·2026

Same author

Posttranslational modifications remodel proteome-wide ligandability.

Nature chemical biology·2026

Same author

Genetic and pharmacological inactivation of peptidoglycan remodeling increases antibiotic susceptibility of vancomycin-resistant <i>Enterococcus faecium</i>.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Same author

Pharmacological Inhibition of SLC33A1 Promotes Endoplasmic Reticulum Hyperoxidation and Induces Adaptive IRE1/XBP1s Signaling.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Same journal

RETRACTED: Atta et al. Effect of Montmorillonite Nanogel Composite Fillers on the Protection Performance of Epoxy Coatings on Steel Pipelines. <i>Molecules</i> 2017, <i>22</i>, 905.

Molecules (Basel, Switzerland)·2026

Same journal

Correction: Chen et al. Chemical Composition of <i>Litsea pungens</i> Essential Oil and Its Potential Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activities. <i>Molecules</i> 2023, <i>28</i>, 6835.

Molecules (Basel, Switzerland)·2026

Same journal

Correction: Ruan et al. Comparison of Extraction, Isolation, Purification, Structural Characterization and Immunomodulatory Activity of Polysaccharides from Two Species of <i>Cistanche</i>. <i>Molecules</i> 2025, <i>30</i>, 4754.

Molecules (Basel, Switzerland)·2026

Same journal

Correction: Li et al. Gastrodin Ameliorates Cognitive Dysfunction in Vascular Dementia Rats by Suppressing Ferroptosis via the Regulation of the Nrf2/Keap1-GPx4 Signaling Pathway. <i>Molecules</i> 2022, <i>27</i>, 6311.

Molecules (Basel, Switzerland)·2026

Same journal

Correction: Zueva et al. Steady-State Kinetics of Enzyme-Catalyzed Hydrolysis of Echothiophate, a P-S Bonded Organophosphorus as Monitored by Spectrofluorimetry. <i>Molecules</i> 2020, <i>25</i>, 1371.

Molecules (Basel, Switzerland)·2026

Same journal

1,4-Diazatriphenylene and Its Hetero-Fused Analogs: Synthesis and Applications.

Molecules (Basel, Switzerland)·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 31, 2026

Discovery of Metastatic Regulators using a Rapid and Quantitative Intravital Chick Chorioallantoic Membrane Model

Discovery of Metastatic Regulators using a Rapid and Quantitative Intravital Chick Chorioallantoic Membrane Model

Published on: February 3, 2021

Charting a Path to Success in Virtual Screening.

Stefano Forli¹

¹Molecular Graphics Laboratory, Department of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, 10550 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA. forli@scripps.edu.

Molecules (Basel, Switzerland)

|October 27, 2015

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Molecular docking and virtual screening are crucial for drug discovery but face challenges. This review details best practices and common issues in docking experiments to improve hit identification success rates.

Keywords:

docking drug design molecular modeling virtual screening

More Related Videos

Competitive Genomic Screens of Barcoded Yeast Libraries

Competitive Genomic Screens of Barcoded Yeast Libraries

Published on: August 11, 2011

High-throughput Screening for Chemical Modulators of Post-transcriptionally Regulated Genes

High-throughput Screening for Chemical Modulators of Post-transcriptionally Regulated Genes

Published on: March 3, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 31, 2026

Discovery of Metastatic Regulators using a Rapid and Quantitative Intravital Chick Chorioallantoic Membrane Model

Discovery of Metastatic Regulators using a Rapid and Quantitative Intravital Chick Chorioallantoic Membrane Model

Published on: February 3, 2021

Competitive Genomic Screens of Barcoded Yeast Libraries

Competitive Genomic Screens of Barcoded Yeast Libraries

Published on: August 11, 2011

High-throughput Screening for Chemical Modulators of Post-transcriptionally Regulated Genes

High-throughput Screening for Chemical Modulators of Post-transcriptionally Regulated Genes

Published on: March 3, 2015

Area of Science:

Computational Chemistry
Drug Discovery
Molecular Modeling

Background:

Molecular docking is widely used in drug design, particularly for high-throughput virtual screening.
Despite advancements, challenges in docking persist, often stemming from input preparation or speed-focused simplifications.

Purpose of the Study:

To review best practices in molecular docking and virtual screening.
To identify and discuss common issues encountered during docking experiments.

Main Methods:

Literature review of molecular docking and virtual screening methodologies.
Analysis of common pitfalls in experimental design and execution.

Main Results:

Challenges in docking are often related to input data quality and algorithmic approximations.
Awareness of limitations is key to avoiding errors and misleading results.

Conclusions:

Optimizing docking protocols and understanding method limitations are essential for successful virtual screening campaigns.
This review provides a guide from experimental design to hit identification.