The myelodysplastic syndromes flow cytometric score: a three-parameter prognostic flow cytometric scoring system

C Alhan1, T M Westers1, E M P Cremers1

  • 1Department of Hematology, Cancer Center Amsterdam (CCA), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Leukemia
|October 28, 2015
PubMed

Insights

A new flow cytometric score (MFS) refines prognosis for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), improving upon the IPSS-R. This practical tool enhances risk stratification, especially within lower-risk MDS categories.

Area of Science:

  • Hematology
  • Oncology
  • Clinical Pathology

Background:

  • Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) prognosis is typically assessed using the revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R).
  • Flow cytometry offers potential for improved MDS prognostication, but its complexity limits routine use.
  • A need exists for a practical, robust flow cytometric score for MDS risk stratification.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a practical flow cytometric score for refining MDS prognosis.
  • To create a score that can be implemented as a routine diagnostic procedure.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of bone marrow aspirates from 109 MDS patients using flow cytometry.
  • Validation of the developed MDS Flow cytometric Score (MFS) in a separate cohort of 103 MDS patients.
  • Identification of key parameters: myeloid progenitor sideward light scatter, CD117 expression, and monocyte CD13 expression.

Main Results:

  • The MFS was constructed using three flow cytometric parameters.
  • Three distinct MFS risk categories were established.
  • Patients with intermediate MFS scores demonstrated significantly better overall survival (OS) than those with high MFS scores.
  • The MFS refined prognostication within the IPSS-R low-risk category, identifying patients with poorer OS.

Conclusions:

  • A practical, three-parameter flow cytometric prognostic score (MFS) for MDS has been developed.
  • The MFS enables further refinement of prognostic assessment in MDS.
  • This score has the potential for routine implementation to improve patient risk stratification and management.