Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

In- and Out-Groups01:31

In- and Out-Groups

44.1K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
44.1K
Robbers Cave04:49

Robbers Cave

15.1K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
15.1K
Impact of Groups on Groups01:19

Impact of Groups on Groups

317
Social psychologists analyze how groups influence one another, shaping social structures and interactions through both cooperation and competition. These dynamics manifest in various ways, ranging from economic partnerships to intergroup conflicts that shape societal structures and perceptions.Cooperation and Competition in Intergroup RelationsIntergroup relationships vary across contexts, sometimes fostering cooperation and mutual benefit while at other times leading to conflict and...
317
Social Loafing01:37

Social Loafing

39.9K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
39.9K
Impact of Individuals on a Group01:25

Impact of Individuals on a Group

415
In social psychology, the interplay between individuals and groups is a central concern, particularly regarding how individual actions and characteristics influence group processes and outcomes. While much research emphasizes the group's power in shaping individual behavior, it is equally significant to understand how individuals contribute to the functioning, development, and success of groups.Individual Roles in Group Productivity and Decision-MakingIndividuals are not passive participants in...
415
Groupthink01:34

Groupthink

50.3K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
50.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The cultural evolution of pluralistic ignorance.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

The evolution of zero-sum and positive-sum worldviews.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

Co-evolution of behaviour and beliefs in social dilemmas: estimating material, social, cognitive and cultural determinants.

Evolutionary human sciences·2024
Same author

Cultural tightness and resilience against environmental shocks in nonindustrial societies.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2024
Same author

Proximate and ultimate drivers of norms and norm change.

Current opinion in psychology·2024
Same author

Modelling social norms: an integration of the norm-utility approach with beliefs dynamics.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2024
Same journal

The microlandscapes of tree trunks: the effect of lichen and tree-level characteristics on arthropod communities.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Centimetre-scale landscapes to assess the motion behaviour and cognition of gastropods and bivalves.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Intertidal microcosms of wave-swept rocky shores: ecological and physiological insights from a uniquely stressful environment.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Temporal and spatial variation in temperature and oxygen at the microscale: key niche axes for aquatic life.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Natural microcosms in ecology: fulfilling the promise of model systems?

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Microbe-induced galls and plant defence: metabolite crosstalk in a co-evolutionary battle.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 31, 2026

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.9K

Collective action problem in heterogeneous groups.

Sergey Gavrilets1

  • 1Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA Department of Mathematics, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA National Institute for Mathematical and Biological Synthesis, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA gavrila@tiem.utk.edu.

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences
|October 28, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

In heterogeneous groups, individuals with the most to gain or least cost contribute most to collective action. Sometimes, these high contributors effectively act as altruists, receiving lower net payoffs.

Keywords:
altruismcollaborationcooperationevolutionarily stable strategiesmathematical modelling

More Related Videos

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.7K
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 31, 2026

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.9K
The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.7K
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.5K

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary biology
  • Behavioral ecology
  • Game theory

Background:

  • Collective action problems arise when individual incentives conflict with group benefit.
  • Group members often vary in characteristics influencing their costs, benefits, and preferences for collective action.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review theoretical and experimental literature on collective action in heterogeneous groups.
  • To analyze evolutionary models predicting the impact of group size and heterogeneity on collective action outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of theoretical and experimental studies.
  • Analysis of evolutionary models incorporating individual differences in costs, benefits, and capabilities.
  • Examination of benefit and cost functions with varying degrees of nonlinearity.

Main Results:

  • Individuals with higher stakes, lower costs, or greater capabilities are typically the largest contributors to collective goods.
  • Under certain conditions, major contributors may receive lower net payoffs, exhibiting altruistic behavior.
  • Group effort decreases with size and increases with heterogeneity under weak nonlinearity; strong nonlinearity reverses these patterns.

Conclusions:

  • Group composition significantly influences collective action dynamics and outcomes.
  • Understanding contributions in heterogeneous groups offers insights into animal behavior, human evolution, and psychology.