Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 31, 2026
Transvaginal Mesh Insertion in the Ovine Model
Published on: July 27, 2017
Reoperation After Robotic and Vaginal Mesh Reconstructive Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Lindsay Ann Martin1, Rose Calixte, Peter S Finamore
1From the *Division of Urogynecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and †Department of Biostatistics, Winthrop University Hospital, Mineola, NY.
Objectives:
Our primary objective was to compare reoperations after robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy and transvaginal mesh for apical prolapse repair. Our secondary aim was to record perioperative complications after robotic and vaginal surgeries.
Methods:
We reviewed medical records of women who underwent vaginal apical mesh support procedures or robotic sacrocolpopexy at Winthrop University Hospital between August 2009 and August 2013. We compared reoperations and perioperative complications between the 2 groups.
Results:
There were 245 eligible cases during the 4-year study period. One hundred eighty-one women underwent robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy and 64 women underwent transvaginal mesh. Women who underwent robotic surgery were younger and had decreased blood loss. Patients were followed up for a median of 3 months after robotic surgery and 11.5 months after transvaginal mesh. We found no difference in overall rate of reoperation between robotic and transvaginal mesh repair for apical prolapse. Specifically, there was no difference in the rate of reoperation for mesh exposure.
Conclusions:
Despite recent controversies, transvaginal mesh offers the benefit of an effective minimally invasive procedure with shorter operative times, and may not pose additional risk for reoperation when compared to robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy.
