Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Experimental RNAi02:15

Experimental RNAi

8.3K
RNA interference (RNAi) is a cellular mechanism that inhibits gene expression by suppressing its transcription or activating the RNA degradation process. The mechanism was discovered by Andrew Fire and Craig Mello in 1998 in plants. Today, it is observed in almost all eukaryotes, including protozoa, flies, nematodes, insects, parasites, and mammals. This precise cellular mechanism of gene silencing has been developed into a technique that provides an efficient way to identify and determine the...
8.3K
siRNA - Small Interfering RNAs02:30

siRNA - Small Interfering RNAs

19.0K
Small interfering RNAs, or siRNAs, are short regulatory RNA molecules that can silence genes post-transcriptionally, as well as the transcriptional level in some cases. siRNAs are important for protecting cells against viral infections and silencing transposable genetic elements.
In the cytoplasm, siRNA is processed from a double-stranded RNA, which comes from either endogenous DNA transcription or exogenous sources like a virus. This double-stranded RNA is then cleaved by the...
19.0K
RNA Interference01:23

RNA Interference

28.6K
RNA interference (RNAi) is a process in which a small non-coding RNA molecule blocks the post-transcriptional expression of a gene by binding to its messenger RNA (mRNA) and preventing the protein from being translated.
This process occurs naturally in cells, often through the activity of genomically-encoded microRNAs. Researchers can take advantage of this mechanism by introducing synthetic RNAs to deactivate specific genes for research or therapeutic purposes. For example, RNAi could be used...
28.6K
MicroRNAs01:22

MicroRNAs

4.3K
MicroRNA (miRNA) are short, regulatory RNA transcribed from introns (non-coding regions of a gene) or intergenic regions (stretches of DNA present between genes). Several processing steps are required to form biologically active, mature miRNA. The initial transcript, called primary miRNA (pri-mRNA), base-pairs with itself, forming a stem-loop structure. Within the nucleus, an endonuclease enzyme, called Drosha, shortens the stem-loop structure into hairpin-shaped pre-miRNA. After the pre-miRNA...
4.3K
MicroRNAs01:22

MicroRNAs

24.6K
MicroRNA (miRNA) are short, regulatory RNA transcribed from introns—non-coding regions of a gene—or intergenic regions—stretches of DNA present between genes. Several processing steps are required to form biologically active, mature miRNA. The initial transcript, called primary miRNA (pri-mRNA), base-pairs with itself forming a stem-loop structure. Within the nucleus, an endonuclease enzyme, called Drosha, shortens the stem-loop structure into hairpin-shaped pre-miRNA. After...
24.6K
Inhibitors of Viral Protein Synthesis01:30

Inhibitors of Viral Protein Synthesis

24
Protein synthesis is indispensable for viral replication, as viruses lack the cellular machinery required for this process and must hijack the host's translational apparatus. In response, host cells deploy a critical innate immune defense involving interferons, specialized cytokines that play a central role in inhibiting viral propagation.Upon viral detection, infected cells release interferons that bind to receptors on adjacent uninfected cells, activating the JAK-STAT signaling pathway and...
24

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Global and regional DNA methylation patterns in heart failure: a case-control analysis.

EBioMedicine·2026
Same author

Blood DNA Methylation Patterns Across Carotid, Coronary, and Peripheral Atherosclerosis: A Comparative Analysis in 2 Prospective Cohorts.

Journal of the American College of Cardiology·2026
Same author

A protein interactome for the last eukaryotic common ancestor illuminates the biochemical basis of modern genetic diseases.

Cell genomics·2026
Same author

The persistence of potential: The life of Sir John B. Gurdon.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Author Correction: The human ciliopathy protein RSG1 links the CPLANE complex to transition zone architecture.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

A protein complex in the extreme distal tip of vertebrate motile cilia controls their organization, length, and function.

Nature communications·2025
Same journal

An Essential Role for Senescent Cells in Optimal Wound Healing through Secretion of PDGF-AA.

Developmental cell·2026
Same journal

AXIN1 and AXIN2 regulate the WNT-signaling landscape to promote distinct mesoderm programs.

Developmental cell·2026
Same journal

ARID1A terminates gastric regeneration to prevent cancer.

Developmental cell·2026
Same journal

Myc sustains sex-biased organ zonation in the Drosophila intestine.

Developmental cell·2026
Same journal

Two parallel neuronal circuits involving electrical synapse and DAF-7/TGF-β signaling regulate muscle autophagy in C. elegans.

Developmental cell·2026
Same journal

Menstruation: Once unspoken but now uncovered, one cell type at a time.

Developmental cell·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 31, 2026

A Reverse Genetic Approach to Test Functional Redundancy During Embryogenesis
06:59

A Reverse Genetic Approach to Test Functional Redundancy During Embryogenesis

Published on: August 11, 2010

12.5K

Morpholinos: Antisense and Sensibility.

Martin Blum1, Edward M De Robertis2, John B Wallingford3

  • 1Institute of Zoology, University of Hohenheim, 70593 Stuttgart, Germany.

Developmental Cell
|October 28, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Antisense morpholino oligonucleotides (MOs) are valuable tools for studying gene function in developmental biology. Despite concerns, properly controlled MOs remain essential for continued research progress.

More Related Videos

Manipulation of Gene Function in Mexican Cavefish
07:01

Manipulation of Gene Function in Mexican Cavefish

Published on: April 22, 2019

10.2K
Microinjection of Zebrafish Embryos to Analyze Gene Function
07:18

Microinjection of Zebrafish Embryos to Analyze Gene Function

Published on: March 9, 2009

79.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 31, 2026

A Reverse Genetic Approach to Test Functional Redundancy During Embryogenesis
06:59

A Reverse Genetic Approach to Test Functional Redundancy During Embryogenesis

Published on: August 11, 2010

12.5K
Manipulation of Gene Function in Mexican Cavefish
07:01

Manipulation of Gene Function in Mexican Cavefish

Published on: April 22, 2019

10.2K
Microinjection of Zebrafish Embryos to Analyze Gene Function
07:18

Microinjection of Zebrafish Embryos to Analyze Gene Function

Published on: March 9, 2009

79.2K

Area of Science:

  • Developmental Biology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Genetics

Background:

  • Antisense morpholino oligonucleotides (MOs) have been widely used for over 15 years in developmental biology research.
  • MOs enable key discoveries regarding developmental mechanisms in various model organisms.
  • Recent concerns regarding the specificity of MOs have led to recommendations against their use.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the advantages of using MOs in developmental biology.
  • To address concerns about MO specificity.
  • To advocate for the continued acceptance of adequately controlled MOs.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of studies utilizing MOs.
  • Analysis of the benefits and limitations of MO technology.
  • Evaluation of the impact of MOs on developmental biology research.

Main Results:

  • MOs offer significant advantages for studying gene function and developmental mechanisms.
  • Concerns about MO specificity can be mitigated through proper experimental controls.
  • Discontinuing MO usage would hinder progress in developmental biology.

Conclusions:

  • Adequately controlled MOs should remain an accepted tool for loss-of-function studies.
  • Continued use of MOs is crucial for advancing developmental biology.
  • The scientific community's extensive experience with MOs supports their utility.