Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Management: by circulatory assist devices.

D G Pennington1, M T Swartz

  • 1Department of Surgery, St. Louis University, Missouri.

Cardiology Clinics
|February 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Flap-in-flap method for enhancing the advancement of a V-Y flap.

Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS·2006
Same author

The "extended pedicle" gastrocnemius free muscle flap.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2003
Same author

An anatomical and clinical study of the dorsal intercostal cutaneous perforators, and application to free microvascular augmented subdermal vascular network (ma-SVN) flaps.

British journal of plastic surgery·2002
Same author

The microvascular augmented subdermal vascular network (ma-SVN) flap: its variations and recent development in using intercostal perforators.

British journal of plastic surgery·2002
Same author

Risk analysis in patients bridged to transplantation.

The Annals of thoracic surgery·2001
Same author

Mechanical circulatory support for acute heart failure.

The Annals of thoracic surgery·2001

Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) offers benefits for cardiogenic shock patients. This review covers patient and device selection, alongside therapy advantages and complications.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Medical Devices
  • Critical Care Medicine

Background:

  • Cardiogenic shock is a life-threatening condition requiring advanced hemodynamic support.
  • Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) has emerged as a critical therapeutic option.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present the current status of MCS in cardiogenic shock.
  • To delineate patient and device selection criteria for optimal outcomes.
  • To discuss the advantages and potential complications of MCS therapy.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current literature on mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock.
  • Analysis of patient selection parameters.
  • Evaluation of device-specific characteristics and indications.
  • Discussion of clinical outcomes and adverse events.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Patient selection for MCS in cardiogenic shock requires careful assessment of clinical status and reversibility of shock.
  • Device selection depends on patient anatomy, hemodynamic needs, and intended duration of support.
  • MCS offers significant survival benefits but is associated with potential complications.

Conclusions:

  • Optimal patient and device selection are paramount for successful MCS implementation in cardiogenic shock.
  • A thorough understanding of MCS advantages and complications is essential for managing these critically ill patients.