Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bias01:22

Bias

8.0K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
8.0K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

11.4K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.4K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

1.6K
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
1.6K
Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data01:16

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

583
Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance,...
583
Methods of Medium Optimization01:28

Methods of Medium Optimization

49
Optimizing growth media enhances microbial proliferation and maximizes product yield. Statistical experimental design methodologies provide structured and reproducible approaches, offering progressively higher levels of robustness and efficiency.The One-Factor-at-a-Time (OFAT) MethodThe One-Factor-at-a-Time (OFAT) method involves adjusting a single variable while keeping all others constant. However, it cannot detect interactions between variables, often leading to suboptimal outcomes when...
49
The Scientific Method01:32

The Scientific Method

275.1K
The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
275.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparison of Different Methods for the Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies-A Simulation Study.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
Same author

When to Adjust for Multiple Testing: A Unifying Guiding Principle.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
Same author

Burnout and Work-Life Balance: A Longitudinal Study Into the Transition From Medical School to Postgraduate Training.

Deutsches Arzteblatt international·2026
Same author

Agreement of minimally invasive pulse wave analysis with pulmonary artery and transpulmonary thermodilution cardiac output measurements in perioperative and intensive care medicine: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

British journal of anaesthesia·2026
Same author

[Training conditions in postgraduate family medicine training in Bavaria and the role of the Competence Center: A comparative cross-sectional study].

Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen·2026
Same author

The screening accuracy of the PROMIS® Anxiety measures in adults - A systematic review and multiple-thresholds meta-analysis.

Journal of psychosomatic research·2026
Same journal

Widening Health Inequality and Causal Metabolic Drivers in Global Colorectal Cancer: A Multi-Dimensional Study.

Cancer informatics·2026
Same journal

GFAP-Dependent Transcriptional Dynamics and Cellular Heterogeneity in Primary, Recurrent, and Grade III Gliomas.

Cancer informatics·2026
Same journal

Translating Data Into Clinical Tools: An Integrative Strategy for Precision Biomarker Identification in Soft Tissue Sarcoma Diagnosis and Prognosis.

Cancer informatics·2026
Same journal

The MAPK Pathway Coordinates an Immunosuppressive Microenvironment in Colorectal Cancer: A Single-Cell Guided Prognostic Model.

Cancer informatics·2026
Same journal

Multi-Scale Cross-Attention Multiple Instance Learning Network for Automated Classification of Colorectal Polyps.

Cancer informatics·2026
Same journal

LEPR Contributes to Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Insights From Mendelian Randomization and Experimental Studies.

Cancer informatics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 31, 2026

Author Spotlight: Integrating Computational and Experimental Approaches in Precision Oncology
07:03

Author Spotlight: Integrating Computational and Experimental Approaches in Precision Oncology

Published on: December 1, 2023

1.6K

Publication Bias in Methodological Computational Research.

Anne-Laure Boulesteix1, Veronika Stierle1, Alexander Hapfelmeier2

  • 1Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany.

Cancer Informatics
|October 29, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Publication bias, the tendency to publish positive results, affects computational research. This study proposes a framework to address this issue and encourages discussion on unpublished negative findings in cancer informatics.

Keywords:
epistemologyfalse research findingsoveroptimismpublication practice

More Related Videos

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
05:02

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Published on: October 24, 2019

34.4K
Applying Cheminformatics to Develop a Structure Searchable Database of Analytical Methods
05:34

Applying Cheminformatics to Develop a Structure Searchable Database of Analytical Methods

Published on: June 6, 2025

1.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 31, 2026

Author Spotlight: Integrating Computational and Experimental Approaches in Precision Oncology
07:03

Author Spotlight: Integrating Computational and Experimental Approaches in Precision Oncology

Published on: December 1, 2023

1.6K
Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
05:02

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Published on: October 24, 2019

34.4K
Applying Cheminformatics to Develop a Structure Searchable Database of Analytical Methods
05:34

Applying Cheminformatics to Develop a Structure Searchable Database of Analytical Methods

Published on: June 6, 2025

1.9K

Area of Science:

  • Computational science
  • Medical informatics
  • Research methodology

Background:

  • Publication bias is a recognized issue in medicine, impacting research integrity.
  • The problem of publication bias and the underreporting of negative findings are less explored in computational research, including cancer informatics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a formal framework for understanding publication bias in methodological computational research.
  • To stimulate discussion and raise awareness regarding publication bias within the scientific community.
  • To explore the challenges associated with collecting and analyzing data on unpublished research.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a novel formal framework to conceptualize publication bias.
  • Conducting a pilot study to gather empirical data on unpublished research efforts.
  • Analysis of challenges encountered during data collection and analysis.

Main Results:

  • The study highlights the potential for publication bias in computational research fields like cancer informatics.
  • An exemplary pilot study provided insights into the practical difficulties of assessing unpublished research.
  • Initial experiences informed the formalization of the publication bias concept.

Conclusions:

  • A formal framework is proposed to better understand and address publication bias in computational research.
  • Increased awareness and discussion are crucial for mitigating the impact of publication bias.
  • Further research is needed to refine methods for collecting and analyzing data on unpublished findings.