Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 31, 2026

Implementation of In Vitro Drug Resistance Assays: Maximizing the Potential for Uncovering Clinically Relevant Resistance Mechanisms
Published on: December 9, 2015
HCV Council--critical appraisal of data: recommendations for clinical practice in a rapidly evolving therapeutic
Nancy Reau1, Michael W Fried2, David R Nelson3
1Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Insights
This review summarizes expert opinions on managing chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, offering guidance for clinicians. It highlights areas needing further research for optimal patient care strategies.
Area of Science:
- Hepatology
- Infectious Diseases
- Clinical Practice Guidelines
Background:
- The Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Council convenes experts to assess current data on chronic HCV management.
- This 2014 meeting built upon the findings of the 2011 HCV Council.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critically evaluate existing data on best practices for managing chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection.
- To develop clinical practice statements addressing areas of controversy with significant clinical impact.
Main Methods:
- Literature review by faculty to support or refute proposed statements.
- Expert faculty voted on the evidence and support level for each statement after comprehensive discussion.
Main Results:
- The article summarizes the detailed analysis and expert opinions presented at the HCV Council 2014.
- Key findings and consensus statements regarding chronic HCV management are outlined.
Conclusions:
- Optimal management strategies for specific patient populations and clinical situations in chronic HCV infection require further investigation.
- The article provides evidence-based expert opinion to guide clinicians while new data emerges.
Background & Aims:
HCV Council 2014, like its predecessor HCV Council 2011, assembled leading clinicians and researchers in the field of hepatitis C to critically evaluate current data regarding best practices for managing patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV).
Methods:
Clinical practice statements were developed that reflect the areas of potential controversy with high clinical impact. Faculty members were responsible for reviewing the literature to support or reject these statements. After a review and comprehensive discussion of the data, the HCV Council faculty voted on the nature of the evidence and the level of support for each statement.
Results:
The results of the detailed analysis with expert opinion are summarized in this article.
Conclusion:
Numerous questions regarding optimal management of certain populations and clinical scenarios remain unanswered. The discussion in the article provides a summary of evidenced-based expert opinion that may help guide clinicians as additional information is developed.
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Overview and Classification
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Affecting Factors
Current Trends in Nursing II
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
