Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Guidelines for Writing Outcome01:11

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

4.2K
When developing expected outcomes for a patient care plan, the nurse should adhere to the following recommendations:
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
4.2K
Nursing Evaluation01:15

Nursing Evaluation

4.7K
The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
4.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Exploring Mixed Feeding Practices Among Indian Mothers: Knowledge, Attitudes, and Reported Barriers to Exclusive Breastfeeding.

CureusĀ·2026
Same author

The state of metabolic engineering in the versatile bacterial cell factory Cupriavidus necator H16.

Metabolic engineeringĀ·2026
Same author

Double bridge to heart transplantation: Outcomes of early versus delayed extracorporeal membrane oxygenation crossover in pediatric population.

JTCVS openĀ·2026
Same author

A practical approach to ABO-incompatible heart transplantation from the Pediatric Heart Transplant Society (PHTS).

JHLT openĀ·2026
Same author

Heart transplantation in pediatric oncology patients.

JHLT openĀ·2026
Same author

Prevalence of Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic Conditions Across Body Mass Index Categories: The Distinct Burden of Severe (Class III) Obesity.

Diabetes, obesity & metabolismĀ·2026
Same journal

In Support of Collaborative Pediatric Device Innovation.

JAMA surgeryĀ·2026
Same journal

Benefits of Surgical Stabilization of Rib Fractures and Delayed Operation.

JAMA surgeryĀ·2026
Same journal

Errors in Methods and Supplement 1.

JAMA surgeryĀ·2026
Same journal

Lumpectomy Margins and Local Recurrence in DCIS: Results From the NRG Oncology/NSABP B-35 Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA surgeryĀ·2026
Same journal

A Closer Look at Costs of California Hospital Operating Rooms.

JAMA surgeryĀ·2026
Same journal

In Support of Collaborative Pediatric Device Innovation-Reply.

JAMA surgeryĀ·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 31, 2026

Utilizing a 3D Printed Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication Model to Shorten a Resident's Learning Curve
08:21

Utilizing a 3D Printed Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication Model to Shorten a Resident's Learning Curve

Published on: August 15, 2025

821

Using Patient Outcomes to Evaluate General Surgery Residency Program Performance.

Neha Bansal1, Kristina D Simmons2, Andrew J Epstein3

  • 1Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia2Department of Surgery, Center for Surgery and Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia.

JAMA Surgery
|October 29, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

General surgery residency programs can be ranked by patient outcomes, but differences between top and bottom programs were small. Performance metrics showed slight variations, suggesting caution for payment-for-performance initiatives.

More Related Videos

Simulator Training for Endovascular Neurosurgery
08:08

Simulator Training for Endovascular Neurosurgery

Published on: May 6, 2020

4.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 31, 2026

Utilizing a 3D Printed Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication Model to Shorten a Resident's Learning Curve
08:21

Utilizing a 3D Printed Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication Model to Shorten a Resident's Learning Curve

Published on: August 15, 2025

821
Simulator Training for Endovascular Neurosurgery
08:08

Simulator Training for Endovascular Neurosurgery

Published on: May 6, 2020

4.3K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Education
  • Surgical Outcomes
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • Evaluating general surgery residency programs requires measurable performance indicators.
  • Linking program performance to objective patient outcomes is crucial for financial rewards.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess general surgery residency program performance using patient clinical outcomes.
  • To establish a ranking system for residency programs based on graduate performance.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective cohort study of 230,769 patients from 349 hospitals (2008-2011).
  • Analysis included 73 general surgery residency programs and 454 surgeons.
  • Outcomes measured: in-hospital death, postoperative complications, prolonged length of stay, and failure to rescue.

Main Results:

  • Surgeons from top-ranked residency programs had significantly lower adverse event rates.
  • Adjusted adverse event rates showed small but significant differences between top and bottom tertile programs.
  • The impact of residency program ranking on outcomes diminished with increased years of surgical practice.

Conclusions:

  • Objective data can successfully rank general surgery residency programs by graduate clinical outcomes.
  • Rankings varied depending on the specific outcome measure used.
  • The magnitude of outcome differences between programs was small, necessitating careful consideration for payment-for-performance initiatives in graduate medical education.