The Cost-Effectiveness of Intensive Interdisciplinary Pediatric Chronic Pain Rehabilitation

Jenny R Evans1, Ethan Benore2, Gerard A Banez2

  • 1Cleveland Clinic Children's jennyevansphd@gmail.com.

Insights

This study shows a 3-week pediatric chronic pain rehabilitation program significantly reduces healthcare costs and parental work absence. The program offers substantial financial savings for families, demonstrating value beyond clinical improvements.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric healthcare economics
  • Rehabilitation program evaluation
  • Chronic pain management

Background:

  • Chronic pain significantly impacts pediatric patients' quality of life and incurs substantial healthcare costs.
  • Interdisciplinary rehabilitation programs offer a promising approach to managing pediatric chronic pain.
  • Evaluating the economic impact of such programs is crucial for stakeholders.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine the cost-effectiveness of a 3-week interdisciplinary pediatric chronic pain rehabilitation program.
  • To assess the program's impact on healthcare utilization and parental work absence.
  • To quantify the financial savings associated with the program.

Main Methods:

  • A cohort of 127 youth with chronic pain was studied.
  • Self-reported healthcare utilization and parental work absence were compared pre- and post-program (1-year follow-up).
  • Financial data were derived from program revenue and national cost benchmarks.

Main Results:

  • Significant reductions were observed in hospitalization days, physician visits, therapy services, and psychotherapy.
  • Estimated annual healthcare expenses decreased by $58,839 per family.
  • Estimated annual cost of parental missed work decreased by $11,039 per family.

Conclusions:

  • The program resulted in estimated savings of $27,119 per family in the year following admission, after accounting for program costs.
  • The interdisciplinary program demonstrates significant economic benefits for families and insurers.
  • The findings highlight the value of the program in improving both clinical outcomes and financial well-being.
Abstract