Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

533
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
533
Clinical Trials01:16

Clinical Trials

11.1K
Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
11.1K
Study Designs in Epidemiology01:20

Study Designs in Epidemiology

1.5K
Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
1.5K
Systematic Sampling Method01:17

Systematic Sampling Method

13.9K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...
13.9K
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

386
Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
386
The Scientific Method in Nursing Process01:18

The Scientific Method in Nursing Process

19.3K
The scientific method provides the foundation for any research. It is the most reliable and objective of all forms of gaining knowledge and guides in applying research-based evidence in practice and conducting future research.
When using research findings to change practice, one must understand the process used to guide a study. The scientific method is a systematic, step-by-step process that supports the data's validity, reliability, and generalizability. As a result, findings can be...
19.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Responsible Research Practices in Pediatrics: How Reporting Guidelines Can Be Used to Improve Trial Design and Conduct.

The Journal of pediatrics·2026
Same author

SPIRIT 2025 statement: updated guideline for protocols of randomised trials.

Lancet (London, England)·2026
Same author

SPIRIT-Children and Adolescents (SPIRIT-C) 2026 extension statement: enhancing the reporting and usefulness of paediatric randomised trial protocols.

The Lancet. Child & adolescent health·2026
Same author

CONSORT-Children and Adolescents (CONSORT-C) 2026 extension statement: enhancing the reporting and impact of paediatric randomised trials.

The Lancet. Child & adolescent health·2026
Same author

Updating the PRISMA reporting guideline for scoping reviews: a scoping review.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same author

PRISMA-Children and Adolescents (PRISMA-C) 2026 extension statement and explanation: enhancing the reporting and utility of systematic reviews of interventions in paediatrics.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2026
Same journal

Strategies for prevention of intraventricular hemorrhage in the neonatal intensive care unit.

Seminars in fetal & neonatal medicine·2026
Same journal

Introduction.

Seminars in fetal & neonatal medicine·2026
Same journal

Introduction.

Seminars in fetal & neonatal medicine·2026
Same journal

Should inhaled nitric oxide be used for respiratory failure in preterm infants?

Seminars in fetal & neonatal medicine·2026
Same journal

Inhaled nitric oxide in premature infants for respiratory failure: Discussion and consensus.

Seminars in fetal & neonatal medicine·2026
Same journal

Critical thinking in red blood cell transfusion decisions: Donor, product, recipient, and outcomes.

Seminars in fetal & neonatal medicine·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 31, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.3K

Systematic reviews and meta-analysis.

Lisa Askie1, Martin Offringa2

  • 1Systematic Reviews and Health Technology Assessment, NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.

Seminars in Fetal & Neonatal Medicine
|October 31, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses synthesize health evidence to minimize bias and maximize data. Understanding their correct application and methodological conditions is crucial for accurate decision-making in healthcare.

Keywords:
Evidence synthesisEvidence-based healthcareMeta-analysisSystematic review

More Related Videos

Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Shugan Jieyu Capsules for the Treatment of Insomnia
04:34

Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Shugan Jieyu Capsules for the Treatment of Insomnia

Published on: February 17, 2023

1.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 31, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.3K
Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Shugan Jieyu Capsules for the Treatment of Insomnia
04:34

Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Shugan Jieyu Capsules for the Treatment of Insomnia

Published on: February 17, 2023

1.7K

Area of Science:

  • Health research methodology
  • Evidence-based practice

Background:

  • Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are crucial for synthesizing health intervention effectiveness.
  • They serve as key information sources for diverse stakeholders, including clinicians and policymakers.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the history and methodological conditions for accurate systematic review and meta-analysis.
  • To explore variations in systematic review methods, outlining their advantages and disadvantages.

Main Methods:

  • Historical review of systematic review and meta-analysis development.
  • Analysis of methodological conditions impacting the correct and incorrect use of these studies.
  • Exploration of novel systematic review variations.

Main Results:

  • Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are vital for evidence synthesis.
  • Adherence to methodological standards is essential to prevent misleading conclusions.
  • New systematic review approaches offer alternative methodologies with distinct benefits and drawbacks.

Conclusions:

  • Proper execution of systematic reviews and meta-analyses is critical for reliable health evidence.
  • Awareness of methodological nuances ensures informed decision-making.
  • Understanding variations in methods aids in selecting appropriate evidence synthesis techniques.