Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Coefficient of Correlation01:12

Coefficient of Correlation

9.2K
The correlation coefficient, r, developed by Karl Pearson in the early 1900s, is numerical and provides a measure of strength and direction of the linear association between the independent variable x and the dependent variable y.
If you suspect a linear relationship between x and y, then r can measure how strong the linear relationship is.
What the VALUE of r tells us:
The value of r is always between –1 and +1: –1 ≤ r ≤ 1.
The size of the correlation r indicates the...
9.2K
Correlations02:20

Correlations

37.0K
Correlation means that there is a relationship between two or more variables (such as ice cream consumption and crime), but this relationship does not necessarily imply cause and effect. When two variables are correlated, it simply means that as one variable changes, so does the other. We can measure correlation by calculating a statistic known as a correlation coefficient. A correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to +1 that indicates the strength and direction of the relationship between...
37.0K
Correlation01:09

Correlation

15.9K
In statistics, two variables are said to be correlated if the values of one variable are associated with the other variable. Depending on the relationship between two variables, correlation can be of three types– positive correlation, negative correlation, and zero correlation.
Two variables, for example, a and b, are said to be positively correlated if both variables move in the same direction. In other words, a positive correlation exists between two variables, a and b, if:
15.9K
Correlation of Experimental Data01:23

Correlation of Experimental Data

522
Dimensional analysis simplifies complex physical problems and guides experimental investigations, but it does not provide complete solutions. It identifies the dimensionless groups that influence a phenomenon, but experimental data is needed to establish the specific relationships and validate theoretical predictions.
For example, a spherical particle moving through a viscous fluid experiences drag. Dimensional analysis shows that the drag force depends on the particle's diameter, velocity,...
522
Calibration Curves: Correlation Coefficient01:10

Calibration Curves: Correlation Coefficient

5.7K
In a linear calibration curve, there is a value called the calibration coefficient, denoted by 'r,' which measures the strength and the direction of association between two variables. The correlation coefficient value ranges from −1 to +1. A value of +1 indicates a perfect positive linear correlation, −1 denotes a perfect negative correlation, and 0 implies no correlation between the two variables. A positive correlation value establishes that as one variable increases, the...
5.7K
Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance01:20

Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance

1.2K
Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance (W), also known as Kendall's W, is a non-parametric statistical measure used to assess the agreement or concordance between multiple raters or judges when they rank a set of items. It is often used when you have ordinal data (ranks) and you want to see if there is consistency or consensus among the raters. It is widely applied in research areas such as psychology, medicine, and social sciences, where multiple judges are asked to rank or rate subjects...
1.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Use of the Wnt/β-catenin Activator Lithium Is Associated with Less Emphysema.

Annals of the American Thoracic Society·2026
Same author

Mitochondrial signatures of infant mesenchymal stem cells predict child adiposity: The Healthy Start Study.

Research square·2026
Same author

Differences in immune cell profiles around the time of islet autoimmunity seroconversion in children with and without type 1 diabetes.

BMJ open diabetes research & care·2026
Same author

Vascular-related proteomic signatures in COPD with suspected pulmonary hypertension as predictors of FEV₁ impairment.

Respiratory research·2026
Same author

Longitudinal changes in epigenetic age acceleration prior to type 1 diabetes onset in the Diabetes Autoimmunity Study in the Young (DAISY).

BMJ open diabetes research & care·2026
Same author

Similarity of sputum mediator signatures between e-cigarette users and COPD depends on GOLD stage and type of e-cigarette: a pilot study.

PloS one·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 31, 2026

Author Spotlight: Emerging Technologies and Advanced Tools for Decoding Metabolomics Data Analysis
07:11

Author Spotlight: Emerging Technologies and Advanced Tools for Decoding Metabolomics Data Analysis

Published on: November 10, 2023

3.5K

The discordant method: a novel approach for differential correlation.

Charlotte Siska1, Russell Bowler2, Katerina Kechris3

  • 1Computational Bioscience Program, Department of Pharmacology, University of Colorado Denver.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)
|November 2, 2015
PubMed
Summary

A new method called Discordant identifies molecular feature pairs with differing correlations between groups, revealing biological interactions missed by other tools. This approach enhances the discovery of phenotype-related features in omics data.

More Related Videos

Dual-Color Fluorescence Cross-Correlation Spectroscopy to Study Protein-Protein Interaction and Protein Dynamics in Live Cells
14:12

Dual-Color Fluorescence Cross-Correlation Spectroscopy to Study Protein-Protein Interaction and Protein Dynamics in Live Cells

Published on: December 11, 2021

6.2K
How to Calculate and Validate Inter-brain Synchronization in a fNIRS Hyperscanning Study
05:33

How to Calculate and Validate Inter-brain Synchronization in a fNIRS Hyperscanning Study

Published on: September 8, 2021

7.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 31, 2026

Author Spotlight: Emerging Technologies and Advanced Tools for Decoding Metabolomics Data Analysis
07:11

Author Spotlight: Emerging Technologies and Advanced Tools for Decoding Metabolomics Data Analysis

Published on: November 10, 2023

3.5K
Dual-Color Fluorescence Cross-Correlation Spectroscopy to Study Protein-Protein Interaction and Protein Dynamics in Live Cells
14:12

Dual-Color Fluorescence Cross-Correlation Spectroscopy to Study Protein-Protein Interaction and Protein Dynamics in Live Cells

Published on: December 11, 2021

6.2K
How to Calculate and Validate Inter-brain Synchronization in a fNIRS Hyperscanning Study
05:33

How to Calculate and Validate Inter-brain Synchronization in a fNIRS Hyperscanning Study

Published on: September 8, 2021

7.7K

Area of Science:

  • Computational biology
  • Bioinformatics
  • Statistical genetics

Background:

  • Current methods for differential correlation analysis focus on the magnitude of difference in correlation coefficients.
  • These methods often fail to detect molecular feature pairs with contrasting correlation patterns (e.g., uncorrelated in one group, correlated in another).
  • Such contrasting patterns can indicate important biological interactions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a novel computational method, Discordant, for identifying differential correlations.
  • To enable the detection of molecular feature pairs with distinct correlation behaviors across different groups.
  • To capture specific types of biological interactions that may be missed by existing approaches.

Main Methods:

  • The Discordant method categorizes correlation types within each group.
  • It compares these categorized correlations to identify significant differences.
  • The method was evaluated using simulations and two biological datasets with diverse omics data.

Main Results:

  • Discordant successfully identifies molecular feature pairs with differential correlation patterns.
  • It achieves similar or higher rates of identifying phenotype-related features compared to existing methods.
  • The method demonstrates reasonable computational efficiency and usability.

Conclusions:

  • The Discordant method offers an improved approach to differential correlation analysis.
  • It enhances the discovery of biologically relevant molecular feature interactions.
  • The tool is available as R code for broader application in omics research.