Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Data Validation01:15

Data Validation

3.6K
Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:
3.6K
Data Validation01:03

Data Validation

7.2K
Data validation is an essential part of a comprehensive assessment. Validation is confirming or verifying and opening the door to gathering more assessment data as it clarifies vague or unclear data. The process of checking and verifying the collected information is called data validation. The primary purpose of data validation is to ensure data is as free from error, bias, and misinterpretation as possible.
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
7.2K
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value01:13

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value

1.8K
In healthcare diagnostics, laboratory tests play a crucial role in identifying and diagnosing a wide range of medical conditions. However, interpreting test results is not always straightforward. An abnormal test result does not always confirm the presence of a disease, just as a normal result does not guarantee its absence. To assess the reliability of these diagnostic tools, healthcare practitioners rely on two key statistical indicators: sensitivity and specificity.
Sensitivity is the...
1.8K
Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test01:02

Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test

4.6K
Sometimes, a data set can have a recorded numerical observation that greatly  deviates from the rest of the data. Assuming that the data is normally distributed, a statistical method called the Grubbs test can be used to determine whether the observation is truly an outlier.  To perform a two-tailed Grubbs test, first, calculate the absolute difference between the outlier and the mean. Then, calculate the ratio between this difference and the standard deviation of the sample. This...
4.6K
Calibration Curves: Correlation Coefficient01:10

Calibration Curves: Correlation Coefficient

5.7K
In a linear calibration curve, there is a value called the calibration coefficient, denoted by 'r,' which measures the strength and the direction of association between two variables. The correlation coefficient value ranges from −1 to +1. A value of +1 indicates a perfect positive linear correlation, −1 denotes a perfect negative correlation, and 0 implies no correlation between the two variables. A positive correlation value establishes that as one variable increases, the...
5.7K
Spearman's Rank Correlation Test01:20

Spearman's Rank Correlation Test

1.6K
Spearman's rank correlation test, also known as Spearman's rho, is a nonparametric method for assessing the strength and direction of association between two variables. This test is particularly valuable when the data distribution is unknown or when the assumption of normality does not hold. Named after the English psychologist and statistician Dr. Charles Edward Spearman, it serves as the nonparametric counterpart to Pearson's correlation coefficient.
Spearman's test calculates correlation by...
1.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Minor differences in the untranslated regions of measles vector additional transcription units are reflected by differential immunogenicity of encoded MERS-CoV Spike antigen.

Journal of virology·2026
Same author

NOX4 signatures in human abdominal aortic aneurysm reveal links to vascular cell plasticity, extracellular matrix remodeling and inflammation.

Free radical biology & medicine·2026
Same author

Searching for non-English literature may be unnecessary for German HTA Reports.

F1000Research·2025
Same author

TMPRSS2-mediated SARS-CoV-2 uptake boosts innate immune activation, enhances cytopathology, and drives convergent virus evolution.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2024
Same author

Systemic therapy in children and adolescents with mental disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BMC psychiatry·2024
Same author

Bayesian random-effects meta-analysis with empirical heterogeneity priors for application in health technology assessment with very few studies.

Research synthesis methods·2023
Same journal

Interpretable Bayesian Modeling for Multireader Multicase Studies: Addressing Overdispersion and Limited Sample Size in Diagnostic Enhancement Evaluation.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Adaptive Sequential Multiple Hypotheses Testing for Concomitant Vaccine Safety Surveillance.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Novel Distance Regression for Repeated Outcomes With Missing Data: Applications to Longitudinal and Crossover Studies of Microbiome Beta-Diversity.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Optimal Weighted Tests for Replication Studies and the 'Two-Trials Rule' With Multiple Hypotheses.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Identifiable Copula-Double-Cox Models: A Fully Parametric Framework for Dependent Right-Censored Survival Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Moving From Individualized Risk-Based Prevention to Benefit-Based Prevention: Estimating Individualized Life-Years Gained From Prevention Services as a Basis for Eligibility.

Statistics in medicine·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 30, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.7K

Differences in surrogate threshold effect estimates between original and simplified correlation-based validation

Christoph Schürmann1, Wiebke Sieben1

  • 1John Wiley, & Sons, Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, U.K.

Statistics in Medicine
|November 3, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Simplified regression analyses using aggregate data can bias surrogate endpoint validation. Meta-regression offers a conservative alternative to individual patient data (IPD) models, while ordinary linear regression should be avoided.

Keywords:
meta-analysissurrogate endpoint validationsurrogate threshold effect

More Related Videos

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data
14:27

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Published on: June 26, 2013

16.5K
Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients
07:34

Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients

Published on: August 22, 2018

8.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 30, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.7K
Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data
14:27

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Published on: June 26, 2013

16.5K
Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients
07:34

Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients

Published on: August 22, 2018

8.7K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Pharmaceutical Statistics
  • Clinical Trial Design

Background:

  • Surrogate endpoint validation is crucial for predicting true endpoint effects in clinical trials.
  • The meta-analytical correlation-based approach and surrogate threshold effect (STE) are established methods.
  • Obtaining individual patient data (IPD) for analyses is often challenging.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the bias introduced by simplified regression analyses using aggregate data compared to full models with IPD.
  • To assess the performance of different analytical approaches for surrogate endpoint validation under various data scenarios.

Main Methods:

  • A simulation study was conducted using individual patient data (IPD).
  • Surrogate threshold effects (STEs) were computed from both full IPD models and simplified analyses (ordinary/weighted linear regression, meta-regression).
  • Simulations varied factors like the number of studies, correlations, and variances.

Main Results:

  • For normally distributed data, STEs from ordinary (weighted) linear regression generally underestimated those from the full IPD model.
  • Meta-regression analyses often resulted in an overestimation of STEs compared to the full IPD model.
  • The extent of bias varied with different data situations.

Conclusions:

  • Simplified analyses using aggregate data can lead to biased STE estimates.
  • Meta-regression provides a more conservative, albeit potentially overestimating, alternative when IPD are unavailable.
  • Ordinary (weighted) linear regression is not recommended for surrogate endpoint validation due to significant underestimation bias.