Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 30, 2026

Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies
Published on: January 16, 2019
Standardizing communication from acute care providers to primary care providers on critically ill adults
Kerri A Ellis1, Ann Connolly1, Alireza Hosseinnezhad1
1Kerri A. Ellis is an assistant clinical professor in the Graduate School of Nursing and an acute care nurse practitioner in the Department of Medicine at UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts. Ann Connolly is a nurse practitioner in the Department of Medicine at UMass Memorial Medical Center. Alireza Hosseinnezhad is a physician in the Department of Medicine, Saint Vincent Hospital, Worcester, Massachusetts. Craig M. Lilly is a professor in the Departments of Medicine, Anesthesiology, and Surgery, and in the Clinical and Population Health Research Program at the Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts.
Objective:
To increase the frequency of communication of patient information between acute and primary care providers. A secondary objective was to determine whether higher rates of communication were associated with lower rates of hospital readmission 30 days after discharge.
Methods:
A validated instrument was used for telephone surveys before and after an intervention designed to increase the frequency of communication among acute care and primary care providers. The communication intervention was implemented in 3 adult intensive care units from 2 campuses of an academic medical center.
Results:
The frequency of communication among acute care and primary care providers, the perceived usefulness of the intervention, and its association with 30-day readmission rates were assessed for 202 adult intensive care episodes before and 100 episodes after a communication intervention. The frequency of documented communication increased significantly (5/202 or 2% before to 72/100 or 72% after the intervention; P < .001) and the communication was considered useful by every participating primary care provider. Rates of rehospitalization at 30 days were lower for the intervention group than the preintervention group, but the difference was not statistically significant (41/202 or 23% vs 16/88 or 18% of discharged patients; P = .45; power 0.112 at P = .05).
Conclusions:
The frequency of communication episodes that provide value can be increased through standardized processes. The key aspects of this effective intervention were setting the expectation that communication should occur, documenting when communication has occurred, and reviewing that documentation during multiprofessional rounds.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
SBAR I: Understanding the Concept
Standardized methods of communication have been developed to ensure that information is...
Guidelines for Nursing Documentation I
Factual:
The following points emphasize the significance of upholding accurate and unbiased documentation in healthcare.
Barriers to Effective Communication II
Cultural barriers:
Differences in values, beliefs, religion, knowledge, and tradition can significantly impact communication. Awareness of nonverbal cues is critical, especially when conversing with a patient from a different culture. What appears appropriate in one culture may be inappropriate in another.
Semantic barriers:
As a result of their tendency to use...
Acute Kidney Injury V: Interprofessional Care
SBAR II: Application of SBAR
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...

