Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 30, 2026

Catheter-based Endovascular Angioplasty for Fibrosing Mediastinitis-associated Pulmonary Vein Stenosis
Published on: August 26, 2025
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention after Fibrinolysis for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients: An
Feng Liu1, Qinglong Guo2, Guoqiang Xie2
1Department of Postgraduate, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing; 2, Department of Cardiology, Kunming General Hospital of Chengdu Military Area, Yunnan, China.
Insights
Early percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) after fibrinolysis is beneficial for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients unable to receive timely PCI. However, immediate PCI following fibrinolysis increases mortality and re-infarction risks.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Acute Coronary Syndromes
Background:
- ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) management involves percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), fibrinolysis, or combination therapy.
- Evaluating the optimal timing of PCI after fibrinolysis is crucial for patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy and safety of PCI after fibrinolysis within 24 hours versus primary PCI alone and ischemia-guided or delayed PCI.
- To determine the optimal therapeutic strategy for STEMI patients.
Main Methods:
- A systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register.
- Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating PCI after fibrinolysis were meta-analyzed using Review Manager 5.30.
Main Results:
- Immediate PCI (≤2 hours post-fibrinolysis) showed higher short-term mortality and re-infarction rates compared to primary PCI alone.
- Early PCI (2-24 hours post-fibrinolysis) demonstrated no significant difference in short-term mortality or re-infarction versus primary PCI alone.
- Both immediate and early PCI increased major bleeding events compared to primary PCI alone.
- Early PCI significantly reduced re-infarction and recurrent ischemia compared to ischemia-guided or delayed PCI, both short-term and long-term.
Conclusions:
- Early PCI after fibrinolysis is a viable option for STEMI patients unable to receive timely primary PCI, offering similar effects to primary PCI alone.
- Immediate PCI after fibrinolysis is associated with detrimental outcomes.
- Early PCI is superior to ischemia-guided or delayed PCI in reducing re-infarction and recurrent ischemia.
Background:
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), fibrinolysis and the combination of both methods are current therapeutic options for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
Methods:
We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Google scholar and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy and safety of PCI after fibrinolysis within 24 hours, which was compared with primary PCI alone and ischemia-guided or delayed PCI. Meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.30 following the methods described by the Cochrane library.
Results:
A total of 16 studies including 10,034 patients were enrolled. As compared with primary PCI alone group, the short-term mortality (5.8% vs 4.5%, RR 1.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00-1.65) and re-infarction rate (4.1% vs 2.7%, RR 1.46, 95%CI 1.05-2.03) were higher in the immediate PCI group (median/mean time ≤ 2 h after fibrinolysis). However, the short-term mortality and re-infarction rate showed no statistically significant differences in the early PCI group (2-24 hours after fibrinolysis). The rate of major bleeding events was higher both in the immediate PCI (6.3% vs 4.4%, RR 1.43, 95%CI 1.11-1.85) and the early PCI group (6.4% vs 4.4%, RR 1.46, 95%CI 1.03-2.06) as compared with primary PCI alone group. As compared with ischemia-guided or delayed PCI, early PCI was associated with significantly reduced re-infarction (2.4% vs 4.0%, RR 0.61, 95%CI 0.41-0.92) and recurrent ischemia (1.5% vs 5.3%, RR 0.29, 95%CI 0.12-0.70) at short-term. And the reduced re-infarction rate was also observed at long-term.
Conclusions:
Early PCI after fibrinolysis, with a relatively broader time for PCI preparation, can bring the similar effects with primary PCI alone and is better than ischemia-guided or delayed PCI in STEMI patients with symptom onset < 12 h who cannot receive timely PCI. However, immediate PCI after fibrinolysis is detrimental.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Clot Retraction and Fibrinolysis
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care

