Should We Routinely Stent the Femoropopliteal Artery? An Interventionalist's Perspective
Nicolas W Shammas1, Subhash Banerjee
1Midwest Cardiovascular Research Foundation, Adjunct Clinical Associate Professor, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Consultant and Interventional Cardiologist Cardiovascular Medicine, PC, 1236 E. Rusholme Street, Suite 300, Davenport, IA 52803 USA. shammas@mchsi.com.
Abstract:
Stenting of femoropopliteal (FP) arterial disease is currently the most common strategy adopted by endovascular specialists. Several randomized trials have shown that stenting with nitinol self-expanding stents leads to less restenosis on intermediate-term and long-term follow-up when compared with plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) and provisional stenting. In this overview, we present the pros and cons of primary stenting of FP arteries vs alternative approaches including provisional stenting following POBA, atherectomy and/or drug-coated balloons, and how these initial non-stent strategies play a significant role in treating FP arterial disease.
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Imaging Studies VII: Vascular Imaging
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Varicose Veins II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care

