Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

26.2K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
26.2K
Bias01:22

Bias

8.0K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
8.0K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

16.1K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
16.1K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

945
945
Blind Procedures02:07

Blind Procedures

13.9K
Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which...
13.9K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

11.4K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Increasing Organ Donor Registrations with Behavioral Interventions: A Field Experiment.

Journal of marketing·2026
Same author

Can reminder emails compel Americans to save? A two-million-person megastudy.

PNAS nexus·2025
Same author

Dishonest behavior can transition to continuous ethical transgressions.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Corrigendum to "Nudging the Nudger: A Field Experiment on the Effect of Performance Feedback to Increase Organ Donor Registrations" [Journal of Health Economics, 97, 102914, 2024].

Journal of health economics·2025
Same author

A national megastudy shows that email nudges to elementary school teachers boost student math achievement, particularly when personalized.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

Effectiveness of ex ante honesty oaths in reducing dishonesty depends on content.

Nature human behaviour·2024
Same journal

Julie Zikherman receives the ASCI/Marian W. Ropes, MD, Award.

The Journal of clinical investigation·2026
Same journal

Targeted degradation of MDM2 overcomes feedback regulation of p53 signaling in Merkel cell carcinoma models.

The Journal of clinical investigation·2026
Same journal

SGLT2 inhibitors enhance ketogenesis by acting as allosteric activators of the mitochondrial enzyme HMGCS2.

The Journal of clinical investigation·2026
Same journal

MDM2 degraders for Merkel cell carcinoma: round peg in a round hole.

The Journal of clinical investigation·2026
Same journal

Ammonia in the crosshairs: microbial targets for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis prevention.

The Journal of clinical investigation·2026
Same journal

Molecular mechanisms regulating cGAS/STING activation in health and disease.

The Journal of clinical investigation·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 30, 2026

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

9.1K

Dishonesty in scientific research.

Nina Mazar, Dan Ariely

    The Journal of Clinical Investigation
    |November 3, 2015
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Dishonesty is common in daily life and scientific research. This study explores rationalizations for dishonest actions and proposes strategies to promote research integrity.

    More Related Videos

    An Open Source Technology Platform to Manufacture Hydrogel-Based 3D Culture Models in an Automated and Standardized Fashion
    08:29

    An Open Source Technology Platform to Manufacture Hydrogel-Based 3D Culture Models in an Automated and Standardized Fashion

    Published on: March 31, 2022

    5.0K
    Cell Culture Techniques and Practices to Avoid Contamination by Fungi and Bacteria in the Research Cell Culture Laboratory
    13:39

    Cell Culture Techniques and Practices to Avoid Contamination by Fungi and Bacteria in the Research Cell Culture Laboratory

    Published on: July 7, 2023

    19.5K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Mar 30, 2026

    An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
    07:36

    An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

    Published on: May 3, 2016

    9.1K
    An Open Source Technology Platform to Manufacture Hydrogel-Based 3D Culture Models in an Automated and Standardized Fashion
    08:29

    An Open Source Technology Platform to Manufacture Hydrogel-Based 3D Culture Models in an Automated and Standardized Fashion

    Published on: March 31, 2022

    5.0K
    Cell Culture Techniques and Practices to Avoid Contamination by Fungi and Bacteria in the Research Cell Culture Laboratory
    13:39

    Cell Culture Techniques and Practices to Avoid Contamination by Fungi and Bacteria in the Research Cell Culture Laboratory

    Published on: July 7, 2023

    19.5K

    Area of Science:

    • Psychology
    • Ethics
    • Scientific Integrity

    Background:

    • Public outrage often follows large-scale corporate fraud (e.g., Enron, Bernard Madoff).
    • However, dishonest actions are prevalent in everyday life, extending beyond major scandals.
    • Situations offering personal advantage often tempt individuals to cut corners.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate the psychological mechanisms behind rationalizing dishonesty.
    • To examine the implications of everyday dishonesty for scientific research practices.
    • To identify methods for cultivating a stronger culture of research integrity.

    Main Methods:

    • The study likely involved a review of psychological theories on rationalization.
    • Analysis of case studies illustrating dishonesty in personal and professional contexts.
    • Exploration of ethical frameworks and best practices in scientific research.

    Main Results:

    • Dishonesty is often rationalized by downplaying the severity or impact of the action.
    • The normalization of minor dishonest acts can create a slippery slope towards more significant ethical breaches.
    • Scientific research is vulnerable to biases and misconduct stemming from rationalized dishonesty.

    Conclusions:

    • Understanding the psychological drivers of dishonesty is crucial for prevention.
    • Implementing robust ethical guidelines and fostering open communication can mitigate research misconduct.
    • Promoting a culture that values integrity over expediency is essential for trustworthy science.