Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 30, 2026

Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
Published on: July 5, 2011
The Importance of Risk Adjustment in Reporting Total Joint Arthroplasty Outcomes
Nelson F SooHoo1, Zhongmin Li2, Vanessa Chan3
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, Santa Monica, California.
Background:
This study describes and tests a risk adjustment model developed for the California Joint Replacement Registry to report predictors of complication rates.
Methods:
Complication rates were analyzed for 9960 patients enrolled in the California Joint Replacement Registry at 22 medical centers. Multivariable logistic risk models were created to analyze risks of postoperative complications.
Results:
Age and American Society of Anesthesiologists class were the strongest predictors of complication rates (P < .0001). Congestive heart failure and peripheral vascular disease were also statistically significant predictors of complications. Three hospitals were found to have statistically significantly worse than expected complication rates, and one was found to have a better than expected complication rate after case mix risk adjustment.
Conclusion:
Adequate risk adjustment is a key element in objective comparison of surgeons, hospitals, and devices using total joint arthroplasty registry data.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Relative Risk
Types of Reports II: Incident or Occurrence Report
Purposes:
In the healthcare industry, reports play a crucial role in documenting incidents within an agency. The primary objective of these reports is to ensure patient safety, uphold the...

