Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Incentive Theory: Pull Theory of Motivation01:18

Incentive Theory: Pull Theory of Motivation

1.2K
Incentive theory, or the "pull theory" of motivation, suggests that external rewards primarily drive behavior. Individuals are motivated to engage in activities when they anticipate a desirable outcome. This is why people often work hard for promotions or study intensively to achieve high grades. These incentives can be tangible, physical rewards such as money or promotions, or intangible, non-physical rewards like praise and social recognition.
The theory differentiates between...
1.2K
Compensation Mechanisms01:28

Compensation Mechanisms

2.5K
The human body employs intricate mechanisms to counteract changes in blood pH, preventing conditions like acidosis (pH < 7.35) and alkalosis (pH > 7.45). These compensatory responses aim to restore normal arterial blood pH by engaging respiratory or renal systems, depending on the source of the imbalance.
Respiratory Compensation
This mechanism addresses metabolic-induced pH imbalances by adjusting breathing rates. Respiratory compensation begins within minutes of detecting a pH...
2.5K
Primary and Secondary Reinforcers01:23

Primary and Secondary Reinforcers

1.5K
In psychology, reinforcement is a key concept in behavior modification. B.F. Skinner demonstrated this with his experiments involving rats in what is known as a Skinner box. The rats learned to press a lever to receive food, a primary reinforcer that fulfilled their innate need for nourishment.
Effective reinforcers for humans vary depending on the individual and the context. Primary reinforcers, such as food, water, sleep, shelter, and pleasure, have inherent value and satisfy basic biological...
1.5K
Timing and Consequences on Behavior01:08

Timing and Consequences on Behavior

683
In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective. 
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
683
Motivational Bias01:25

Motivational Bias

473
Cognitive bias results from limitations in thinking and information processing, leading to systematic errors in judgment. Conversely, motivational bias stems from personal desires or emotions, causing distortions in perception to align with self-interest. Motivational bias influences how individuals perceive and attribute causes to events, often shaped by personal needs, goals, and self-esteem preservation. This bias can distort judgment, leading to inaccurate assessments of success, failure,...
473
Secondary Motives: Power Motivation and Achievement Motivation01:27

Secondary Motives: Power Motivation and Achievement Motivation

678
Power motivation and achievement motivation are two essential social motives identified by psychologist David McClelland. These motives influence behavior in various personal and professional contexts, shaping how individuals interact with others and pursue their goals.
Power motivation is characterized by the desire to influence, control, or have an impact on others. It is shaped by an individual's experiences, social environment, and cultural context. People with high power motivation are...
678

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Accurate movement of two-probe components.

Ergonomics·2017
Same author

Posture and performance: sitting vs. standing for security screening.

Ergonomics·2008
Same author

The future of ergonomics/the future of work: 45 years after Bartlett (1962).

Ergonomics·2007
Same author

Measurement and the practising ergonomist.

Ergonomics·2003
Same author

Postural discomfort and perceived exertion in standardized box-holding postures.

Ergonomics·2002
Same author

Adaptation and sensitivity to postural change in sitting.

Human factors·2001
Same journal

Identification of systemic barriers, facilitators and adaptations to effective record-keeping: a South African primary healthcare clinic case study.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Layer-specific facial soft-tissue thickness in 1174 Chinese adults: Implications for finite-element headforms and ergonomic design.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

The dual effects of information presentation speed on operator performance in dynamic tasks: a study in supervisory control and data acquisition interfaces.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Evaluating generative AI teaching assistants in simulated learning environments: how instructor type and support type affect students' perceptions.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Swipe smart, not hard: hand health of smartphone users in a university population.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Couriers' work-related musculoskeletal disorders and psychological distress: Insights for work errors and traffic safety.

Ergonomics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 30, 2026

Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans
12:09

Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans

Published on: March 19, 2014

24.4K

Monetary and Non-Monetary Incentives in Motor Performance.

E B Daniels1, G V Kobas1, C G Drury1

  • 1a State University of New York at Buffalo , Buffalo , New York.

Ergonomics
|November 4, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Monetary feedback significantly improves motor skill performance by reducing errors by 45% in a drawing task. Real money feedback was more effective than imaginary money, enhancing learning and skill acquisition.

More Related Videos

Lower Limb Biomechanical Analysis of Healthy Participants
06:36

Lower Limb Biomechanical Analysis of Healthy Participants

Published on: April 15, 2020

9.8K
Pavlovian Conditioned Approach Training in Rats
06:57

Pavlovian Conditioned Approach Training in Rats

Published on: February 4, 2016

11.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 30, 2026

Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans
12:09

Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans

Published on: March 19, 2014

24.4K
Lower Limb Biomechanical Analysis of Healthy Participants
06:36

Lower Limb Biomechanical Analysis of Healthy Participants

Published on: April 15, 2020

9.8K
Pavlovian Conditioned Approach Training in Rats
06:57

Pavlovian Conditioned Approach Training in Rats

Published on: February 4, 2016

11.6K

Area of Science:

  • Motor learning and control
  • Cognitive psychology
  • Behavioral economics

Background:

  • Knowledge of results (KR) is crucial for motor skill acquisition.
  • Previous research has explored various feedback types.
  • The impact of monetary incentives on motor performance requires further investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the effect of monetary feedback value on motor task performance.
  • To compare the efficacy of real versus imaginary monetary feedback.
  • To examine the influence of risk and error cost on motor skill execution.

Main Methods:

  • Three experiments were conducted using a simple motor task (drawing between parallel lines).
  • Participants received cumulative achievement feedback with varying monetary values (real vs. imaginary).
  • Movement speed and error rates were measured to assess performance.

Main Results:

  • Movement speed remained consistent across all feedback conditions.
  • Error reduction was 45% higher when real money was used as feedback compared to imaginary money.
  • Performance significantly improved with any knowledge of results compared to no feedback.
  • Neither the risk of losing money nor changes in error cost significantly affected performance.

Conclusions:

  • Monetary incentives, particularly real money, can significantly enhance motor skill learning and reduce errors.
  • The magnitude of monetary reward is more impactful than the risk of loss or error cost.
  • Findings have implications for designing effective motor skill training and assessment protocols.