Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 30, 2026

Tracking the Mammary Architectural Features and Detecting Breast Cancer with Magnetic Resonance Diffusion Tensor Imaging
Published on: December 15, 2014
Use of Diffusion Weighted Imaging in Differentiating Between Maligant and Benign Meningiomas. A Multicenter Analysis
Alexey Surov1, Daniel T Ginat2, Eser Sanverdi3
1Department of Radiology, Martin-Luther-University, Halle-Wittenberg, Germany; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany; University of Chicago, Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Background:
Meningioma is the most frequent intracranial tumor and is often an incidental finding on imaging. Some imaging-based scores were suggested for differentiating low- and high-grade meningiomas. The purpose of this work was to compare diffusion-weighted imaging findings of different meningiomas in a large multicenter study by using apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values for predicting tumor grade and proliferation potential.
Methods:
Data from 7 radiologic departments were acquired retrospectively. Overall, 389 patients were collected. All meningiomas were investigated by magnetic resonance imaging (1.5-T scanner) by using diffusion-weighted imaging (b values of 0 and 1000 s/mm(2)). The comparison of ADC values was performed by Mann-Whitney U test.
Results:
World Health Organization grade I was diagnosed in 271 cases (69.7%), grade II in 103 (26.5%), and grade III in 15 patients (3.9%). Grade I meningiomas showed statistically significant higher ADC values (1.05 ± 0.39 × 10(-3) mm(2)s(-1)) in comparison with grade II (0.77 ± 0.15 × 10(-3) mm(2)s(-1); P = 0.001) and grade III tumors (0.79 ± 0.21 × 10(-3) mm(2)s(-1); P = 0.01). An ADC value of <0.85 × 10(-3) mm(2)s(-1) was determined as the threshold in differentiating between grade I and grade II/III meningiomas (sensitivity, 72.9%; specificity, 73.1%; accuracy, 73.0%). Ki67 was associated with ADC (r = -0.63, P < 0.001). The optimal threshold for the ADC was (less than) 0.85 × 10(-3) mm(2)s(-1) for detecting tumors with high proliferation potential (Ki67 ≥5%).
Conclusions:
The estimated threshold ADC value of 0.85 can differentiate grade I meningioma from grade II and III tumors. The same ADC value is helpful for detecting tumors with high proliferation potential.
Related Concept Videos
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Assessment of Diffusion and Perfusion
The Role of Diffusion in Respiration
Diffusion is the process by which molecules move from an area of higher concentration to an area of lower concentration. In the respiratory system, this...

