Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Anesthetic risk factors.

H Haljamäe1

  • 1Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.

Acta Chirurgica Scandinavica. Supplementum
|January 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Surgical outcomes depend on patient and surgery factors. Multifactorial models, considering variables beyond the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System, enable individualized risk prediction for better surgical planning.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Haemodynamic effects of volume resuscitation by hypertonic saline-dextran (HSD) in porcine acute cardiac tamponade.

Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica·2003
Same author

No going back: narratives by close relatives of the braindead patient.

Intensive & critical care nursing·2002
Same author

Routine intra-operative assessment of pain and/or depth of anaesthesia by nurse anaesthetists in clinical practice.

Journal of clinical nursing·2002
Same author

Assessing pain responses during general anesthesia.

AANA journal·2002
Same author

Influence of expectations and actual pain experiences on satisfaction with postoperative pain management.

European journal of pain (London, England)·2001
Same author

Strategies used in post-operative pain assessment and their clinical accuracy.

Journal of clinical nursing·2000
Same journal

Renal perfusion and metabolism in experimental endotoxin shock.

Acta chirurgica Scandinavica. Supplementum·1991
Same journal

Changing the smoking habit and its influence on the management of vascular disease.

Acta chirurgica Scandinavica. Supplementum·1990
Same journal

What is the actual need for vascular surgery and how do we obtain the required resources?

Acta chirurgica Scandinavica. Supplementum·1990
Same journal

The benefits of proximal and distal vascular reconstruction as a one-stage procedure.

Acta chirurgica Scandinavica. Supplementum·1990
Same journal

In situ or reversed vein bypass for lower limb revascularization?

Acta chirurgica Scandinavica. Supplementum·1990
Same journal

Is femoropopliteal bypass surgery indicated for the treatment of intermittent claudication?

Acta chirurgica Scandinavica. Supplementum·1990
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine
  • Surgical Risk Assessment
  • Patient Safety

Background:

  • Patient and surgical variables influence surgical outcomes.
  • The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Classification System is limited in predicting individual patient risk.
  • Existing risk assessment tools do not fully capture the complexity of surgical outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the importance of multifactorial approaches in surgical risk prediction.
  • To advocate for the inclusion of patient- and surgery-related variables beyond the ASA Physical Status Classification System.
  • To emphasize the need for individualized risk assessment in surgical procedures.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature on surgical risk factors.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of the limitations of the ASA Physical Status Classification System.
  • Discussion of the benefits of multifactorial risk assessment models.

    • Main Results:

    • Patient age, sex, and surgical characteristics (type, site, duration) are significant predictors of outcome.
    • The ASA Physical Status Classification System alone has limited predictive value for individual cases.
    • Anesthetic technique and anesthesiologist skill are important, but anesthetic agents themselves have less impact on outcomes.

    Conclusions:

    • Multifactorial risk assessment, incorporating patient and surgical variables, is crucial for individualized risk prediction.
    • A comprehensive approach enhances the ability to anticipate and manage potential complications.
    • Optimizing anesthetic technique and anesthesiologist expertise contributes to improved surgical outcomes.