Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 30, 2026

Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community
Published on: May 31, 2019
Making defensible decisions in the era of recovery and rights
Andrew Carroll1, Bernadette McSherry2
1Associate Professor (Adjunct), Centre for Forensic Behavioural Science, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC, and; Honorary Senior Fellow, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, and; Consultant Forensic Psychiatrist, Forensicare, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Objectives:
Our aim was to develop a framework for clinical decision-making that can be used to take into account risk in an era of recovery and rights.
Conclusion:
We developed a framework influenced by civil liability law to develop a guide for clinical decision-making which emphasises collaboration, clarification of the available information and communication of decisions as essential components of recovery-oriented risk management.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Standards of Care II
Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Impression Management Techniques III: Aligning Actions
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Equity Theory

