Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

MEA-Based Graph Deviation Network for Early Autism Syndrome Signatures in Human Forebrain Organoids.

Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.)·2025
Same author

'Some like it cold'. On the association between the physical and affective notion of warmth.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2025
Same author

Assembloid learning: opportunities and challenges for personalized approaches to brain functioning in health and disease.

Frontiers in artificial intelligence·2024
Same author

Abstract concepts and simulated competition.

Psychological research·2023
Same author

Vulnerability factors and neuropsychiatric disorders: What could be learned from individual variability in cognitive functions.

Frontiers in psychology·2023
Same author

Do graspable objects always leave a motor signature? A study on memory traces.

Experimental brain research·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 30, 2026

An Operant Intra-/Extra-dimensional Set-shift Task for Mice
08:35

An Operant Intra-/Extra-dimensional Set-shift Task for Mice

Published on: January 22, 2016

12.9K

Disadvantageous associations: Reversible spatial cueing effects in a discrimination task.

Daniele Nico1, Elena Daprati2,3

  • 1Dipartimento di Psicologia, Università degli Studi di Roma "La Sapienza", Italia.

Scientific Reports
|November 5, 2015
PubMed
Summary

Cognitive and associative learning mechanisms interact, influencing behavior even without conscious awareness. This study demonstrates how implicit cues impact learning and response times.

More Related Videos

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

1.0K
Operant Procedures for Assessing Behavioral Flexibility in Rats
08:30

Operant Procedures for Assessing Behavioral Flexibility in Rats

Published on: February 15, 2015

21.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 30, 2026

An Operant Intra-/Extra-dimensional Set-shift Task for Mice
08:35

An Operant Intra-/Extra-dimensional Set-shift Task for Mice

Published on: January 22, 2016

12.9K
Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

1.0K
Operant Procedures for Assessing Behavioral Flexibility in Rats
08:30

Operant Procedures for Assessing Behavioral Flexibility in Rats

Published on: February 15, 2015

21.8K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Learning Science

Background:

  • Learning is explained by cognitive or associative mechanisms.
  • The interaction between cognitive control and automatic associative processes remains unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the interaction between cognitive and associative learning mechanisms.
  • To determine how explicit instructions and implicit information influence behavior.

Main Methods:

  • A shape-discrimination task was used with explicit instructions and implicit spatial cues.
  • Modality and salience of the spatial cue were manipulated across three experiments.
  • Participants' responses and conscious recognition of associations were recorded.

Main Results:

  • A priming effect was consistently observed, indicating stimuli were not ignored.
  • Response times were modulated (slower or faster) by the salience of the implicit spatial cue.
  • Participants did not consciously recognize the learned association.

Conclusions:

  • Cognitive and associative learning mechanisms coexist and interact functionally.
  • Implicit learning can influence behavior even when not consciously perceived.
  • The salience of implicit cues modulates the interaction between learning systems.