Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Determination of Crystal Structures01:29

Determination of Crystal Structures

104
In the late 1800s, the revelation that light extended beyond visible wavelengths led to the discovery of X-rays by Wilhelm Roentgen. Recognized as high-energy electromagnetic radiation with short wavelengths, X-rays prompted exploration into their interaction with crystals. Max von Laue proposed in 1912 that the periodic arrangement of atoms, ions, or molecules in crystals would cause them to diffract X-rays, a hypothesis confirmed through experiments with copper sulfate and zinc sulfide...
104
Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II01:19

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II

1.4K
In gas chromatography, different detectors are employed to meet specific analytical needs. These detectors are often categorized based on their detection mechanisms and the types of compounds they are best suited to analyze. Thermal Conductivity Detectors (TCD), Flame Ionization Detectors (FID), and Electron Capture Detectors (ECD) represent common categories, each with unique operating principles and applications. However, beyond these, several other detectors are designed for more specialized...
1.4K
Gas Chromatography: Overview of Detectors01:13

Gas Chromatography: Overview of Detectors

2.4K
Detectors in gas chromatography (GC) help identify and quantify the components of a mixture by translating chemical properties into measurable signals, which are displayed on a chromatogram. Detectors can be categorized into two main types: destructive and non-destructive.
A non-destructive detector allows a sample to be analyzed without altering or consuming it, meaning the sample can be collected after detection for further analysis. Examples include thermal conductivity detectors and...
2.4K
Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-I01:21

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-I

2.0K
There are different types of detectors used in gas chromatography, each with its own specific properties that make it suitable for detecting certain types of analytes. The most commonly used detectors in GC are thermal conductivity detector (TCD), flame ionization detector (FID), and electron capture detector (ECD).
TCD is the earliest and most widely used detector that operates by measuring the changes in the thermal conductivity of the carrier gas. When a sample compound enters the detector,...
2.0K
High-Performance Liquid Chromatography: Types of Detectors01:15

High-Performance Liquid Chromatography: Types of Detectors

2.2K
The role of the detectors in High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) is to analyze the solutes as they exit from the chromatographic column. The detector recognizes the solute's property and generates corresponding electrical signals, which are converted into a readable graph of the detector's response versus elution time called a chromatogram at the computer. There are several types of HPLC detectors, each with its own advantages and limitations, depending on the analyte...
2.2K
X-ray Imaging01:24

X-ray Imaging

11.0K
German physicist Wilhelm Röntgen (1845–1923) was experimenting with electrical current when he discovered that a mysterious and invisible "ray" would pass through his flesh but leave an outline of his bones on a screen coated with a metal compound. In 1895, Röntgen made the first durable record of the internal parts of a living human: an "X-ray" image (as it came to be called) of his wife’s hand. Scientists worldwide quickly began their own experiments with...
11.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

RDI[Formula: see text]a regression detectability index for quality assurance in: x-ray imaging.

Physics in medicine and biology·2020
Same author

Can a channelized Hotelling observer assess image quality in acquired mammographic images of an anthropomorphic breast phantom including image processing?

Medical physics·2018
Same author

LEAD COMPOSITE VS. NONLEAD PROTECTIVE GARMENTS: WHICH ARE BETTER? A MULTIVENDOR COMPARISON.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2017
Same author

Can the channelized Hotelling observer including aspects of the human visual system predict human observer performance in mammography?

Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB)·2017
Same author

Can the non-pre-whitening model observer, including aspects of the human visual system, predict human observer performance in mammography?

Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB)·2016
Same author

MULTICENTRE COMPARISON OF PATIENT AND DETECTOR DOSE FOR X-RAY-GUIDED EMBOLISATIONS OF ARTERIOVENOUS MALFORMATIONS IN THE BRAIN.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2016

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 30, 2026

Dosimetry for Cell Irradiation using Orthovoltage 40-300 kV X-Ray Facilities
06:51

Dosimetry for Cell Irradiation using Orthovoltage 40-300 kV X-Ray Facilities

Published on: February 20, 2021

5.7K

COMPARISON OF WIRELESS DETECTORS FOR DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY SYSTEMS: IMAGE QUALITY AND DOSE.

J E M Mourik1, P van der Tol2, W J H Veldkamp2

  • 1Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Sint Franciscus Vlietland Group, Kleiweg 500, Rotterdam 3045 PM, The Netherlands Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Albinusdreef 2, Leiden 2333 ZA, The Netherlands j.mourik@franciscus.nl.

Radiation Protection Dosimetry
|November 5, 2015
PubMed
Summary

This study compared wireless digital radiography detectors, finding significant variations in radiation dose and image quality across seven vendors. Optimizing imaging technology and protocols is crucial for better digital chest imaging.

More Related Videos

Clinical Imaging of Microwave Mammography
05:28

Clinical Imaging of Microwave Mammography

Published on: November 14, 2025

383
A Basic Positron Emission Tomography System Constructed to Locate a Radioactive Source in a Bi-dimensional Space
14:19

A Basic Positron Emission Tomography System Constructed to Locate a Radioactive Source in a Bi-dimensional Space

Published on: February 1, 2016

9.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 30, 2026

Dosimetry for Cell Irradiation using Orthovoltage 40-300 kV X-Ray Facilities
06:51

Dosimetry for Cell Irradiation using Orthovoltage 40-300 kV X-Ray Facilities

Published on: February 20, 2021

5.7K
Clinical Imaging of Microwave Mammography
05:28

Clinical Imaging of Microwave Mammography

Published on: November 14, 2025

383
A Basic Positron Emission Tomography System Constructed to Locate a Radioactive Source in a Bi-dimensional Space
14:19

A Basic Positron Emission Tomography System Constructed to Locate a Radioactive Source in a Bi-dimensional Space

Published on: February 1, 2016

9.0K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Radiography Technology
  • Diagnostic Radiology

Background:

  • Wireless detectors are increasingly used in digital radiography.
  • Standardization of protocols for wireless detector systems is lacking.
  • Variations in dose and image quality can impact diagnostic accuracy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the entrance dose at the detector (EDD) and phantom (EPD) and image quality (IQFinv) of wireless detectors from seven vendors.
  • To evaluate differences between local clinical protocols and a reference protocol for digital chest radiography.
  • To calculate the effective dose for various acquisition protocols.

Main Methods:

  • Measurements of EDD, EPD, and IQFinv were performed for seven different wireless detector systems.
  • Both local clinical and a reference protocol were assessed.
  • Effective dose was calculated based on the measured parameters.

Main Results:

  • Significant variations in EDD (1.4-11.8 µGy), EPD (13.9-80.2 µGy), and IQFinv (1.4-4.1) were observed across clinical protocols.
  • Effective dose remained below 0.04 mSv for all evaluated protocols.
  • Substantial performance differences were noted among the seven wireless detector systems.

Conclusions:

  • There are significant differences in dose and image quality among wireless detectors for digital chest radiography.
  • While effective doses are low, further optimization of imaging technology and acquisition protocols is necessary.
  • Standardization and improved protocols are warranted for consistent and high-quality digital chest imaging.