Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 30, 2026

Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide
Published on: January 15, 2017
Leveraging Trainees to Improve Quality and Safety at the Point of Care: Three Models for Engagement
Laura Johnson Faherty1, Kedar S Mate, James M Moses
1L. Johnson Faherty is Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Clinical Scholar, University of Pennsylvania, and pediatrician, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. K.S. Mate is senior vice president, Institute of Healthcare Improvement, Cambridge, Massachusetts, assistant professor of medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, and research fellow, Division of Global Health Equity, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. J.M. Moses is academic advisor, Open School, Institute for Healthcare Improvement, Cambridge, Massachusetts; assistant professor of pediatrics, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts; and director of patient safety and quality, Department of Pediatrics, and medical director of quality improvement, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract:
Trainees, as frontline providers who are acutely aware of quality improvement (QI) opportunities and patient safety (PS) issues, are key partners in achieving institutional quality and safety goals. However, as academic medical centers accelerate their initiatives to prioritize QI and PS, trainees have not always been engaged in these efforts. This article describes the development of an organizing framework with three suggested models of varying scopes and time horizons to effectively involve trainees in the quality and safety work of their training institutions. The proposed models, which were developed through a literature review, expert interviews with key stakeholders, and iterative testing, are (1) short-term, team-based, rapid-cycle initiatives; (2) medium-term, unit-based initiatives; and (3) long-term, health-system-wide initiatives. For each, the authors describe the objective, scope, duration, role of faculty leaders, steps for implementation in the clinical setting, pros and cons, and examples in the clinical setting. There are many barriers to designing the ideal training environments that fully engage trainees in QI/PS efforts, including lack of protected time for faculty mentors, time restrictions due to rotation-based training, and structural challenges. However, one of the most promising strategies for overcoming these barriers is integrating QI/PS principles into routine clinical care. These models provide opportunities for trainees to successfully learn and apply quality and safety principles to routine clinical care at the team, unit, and system level.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Nursing Implementation
The five steps to implementing effective nursing care include reassessing the patient, reviewing and revising the existing nursing care plan, organizing the resources and care delivery, anticipating and preventing complications, and implementing nursing interventions.
Patient-centered Care
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...
Types of Reports I: Hand-off Report
Following are the key components and categories of hand-off reports:
Purpose and Process:
Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is...

