Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 30, 2026

Author Spotlight: Collecting Neural Stem and Progenitor Cells from Live Animals Using a Novel Brain Milking Protocol
Published on: February 9, 2024
SOX2 and SOX2-MYC Reprogramming Process of Fibroblasts to the Neural Stem Cells Compromised by Senescence
Marta Winiecka-Klimek1,2, Maciej Smolarz1,2, Maciej P Walczak1
1Department of Research and Development, Celther Polska, Lodz, Poland.
Abstract:
Tumorigenic potential of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) infiltrating population of induced neural stem cells (iNSCs) generated from iPSCs may limit their medical applications. To overcome such a difficulty, direct reprogramming of adult somatic cells into iNSCs was proposed. The aim of this study was the systematic comparison of induced neural cells (iNc) obtained with different methods-direct reprogramming of human adult fibroblasts with either SOX2 (SiNSc-like) or SOX2 and c-MYC (SMiNSc-like) and induced pluripotent stem cells differentiation to ebiNSc-in terms of gene expression profile, differentiation potential as well as proliferation properties. Immunocytochemistry and real-time PCR analyses were used to evaluate gene expression profile and differentiation potential of various iNc types. Bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) incorporation and senescence-associated beta-galactosidase (SA-β-gal) assays were used to estimate proliferation potential. All three types of iNc were capable of neuronal differentiation; however, astrocytic differentiation was possible only in case of ebiNSc. Contrary to ebiNSc generation, the direct reprogramming was rarely a propitious process, despite 100% transduction efficiency. The potency of direct iNSCs-like cells generation was lower as compared to iNSCs obtained by iPSCs differentiation, and only slightly improved when c-MYC was added. Directly reprogrammed iNSCs-like cells were lacking the ability to differentiate into astrocytic cells and characterized by poor efficiency of neuronal cells formation. Such features indicated that these cells could not be fully reprogrammed, as confirmed mainly with senescence detection. Importantly, SiNSc-like and SMiNSc-like cells were unable to achieve the long-term survival and became senescent, which limits their possible therapeutic applicability. Our results suggest that iNSCs-like cells, generated in the direct reprogramming attempts, were either not fully reprogrammed or reprogrammed only into neuronal progenitors, mainly because of the inaccuracies of currently available protocols.
Insights
Directly reprogramming adult cells into neural stem cells (iNSCs) is less effective than differentiation from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). Directly reprogrammed cells show limited differentiation and senescence, hindering therapeutic use.
Area of Science:
- Stem Cell Biology
- Neuroscience
- Regenerative Medicine
Background:
- Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) carry tumorigenic risks, limiting their use in generating induced neural stem cells (iNSCs).
- Direct reprogramming of somatic cells offers an alternative route to iNSCs, bypassing iPSC generation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically compare induced neural cells (iNc) generated via direct reprogramming versus iPSC differentiation.
- To evaluate gene expression, differentiation potential, and proliferation properties of different iNc types.
Main Methods:
- Direct reprogramming of human fibroblasts using SOX2 (SiNSc-like) or SOX2 and c-MYC (SMiNSc-like).
- Generation of iNSCs from iPSCs (ebiNSc).
- Immunocytochemistry, real-time PCR, BrdU incorporation, and SA-β-gal assays for characterization.
Main Results:
- All iNc types exhibited neuronal differentiation potential; only ebiNSc showed astrocytic differentiation.
- Direct reprogramming yielded lower efficiency and neuronal formation compared to iPSC differentiation.
- Directly reprogrammed cells (SiNSc-like, SMiNSc-like) exhibited senescence and limited long-term survival.
Conclusions:
- Direct reprogramming protocols are currently insufficient for generating fully reprogrammed iNSCs with broad differentiation capacity.
- Directly reprogrammed iNSCs may be immature or restricted to neuronal progenitors, limiting therapeutic applications.
- iPSC differentiation remains a more robust method for generating clinically relevant iNSCs.
Related Concept Videos
Somatic to iPS Cell Reprogramming
Methods of Nuclear Reprogramming

