Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Introduction to Global Positioning System01:30

Introduction to Global Positioning System

726
The Global Positioning System (GPS) revolutionized positioning on Earth, providing precise location data through satellite ranging. The GPS system was developed in 1978 by the U.S. Department of Defense  for military use, and it became available for civilian applications in 1983, transforming fields including navigation, fleet management, and time synchronization for telecommunications systems.GPS consists of satellites in medium Earth orbit, about 20,200 kilometers above the surface,...
726
Local Attraction01:22

Local Attraction

479
Local attraction refers to disturbances in compass readings caused by magnetic influences from nearby objects such as metal fences, buried pipes, vehicles, buildings, power lines, or natural iron ore deposits. Small items like wristwatches, steel tools, or belt buckles can also interfere with the compass by creating local magnetic fields that distort the Earth's natural magnetic field. These distortions lead to inaccurate readings, posing navigation and land surveying challenges.Local...
479
Field Application of Global Positioning System01:28

Field Application of Global Positioning System

371
The Global Positioning System (GPS) has become an indispensable tool in fieldwork, offering unparalleled precision and efficiency for surveying, navigation, and infrastructure development. By harnessing signals from a constellation of satellites, GPS receivers determine the location of objects with remarkable speed and accuracy, often completing calculations within a second.Advantages of Modern GPS TechnologyContemporary GPS receivers are designed to meet the practical demands of field...
371
Design Example: Identifying the Locations of Monuments in the Field Using Global Positioning System Device01:30

Design Example: Identifying the Locations of Monuments in the Field Using Global Positioning System Device

471
Surveyors use Global Positioning System (GPS) technology to measure the precise location and elevation of points on Earth. In a recent survey, GPS receivers were used to determine the coordinates and elevations of two park monuments. The process involved careful mission planning, data collection, and correction to ensure accuracy. The survey began with mission planning to identify optimal satellite visibility and minimize Position Dilution of Precision (PDOP). A geodetic control point...
471
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

7.9K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.9K
Errors in Global Positioning System01:26

Errors in Global Positioning System

410
Global Positioning System (GPS) technology has revolutionized navigation and positioning, but its accuracy is often compromised by various errors. These errors, stemming from environmental, satellite, and receiver-related factors, require careful mitigation to ensure reliable performance across applications.Atmospheric ErrorsGPS signals travel through the Earth’s ionosphere and troposphere, introducing delays which affect accuracy. The ionosphere is strongly influenced by charged particles,...
410

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Distinct Mechanisms for Panoramic and Landmark-Based View Integration in Human Place-Selective Cortex.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2025
Same author

Cognitive maps for hierarchical spaces in the human brain.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2025
Same author

A Neural Compass in the Human Brain during Naturalistic Virtual Navigation.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2025
Same author

Cognitive maps for hierarchical spaces in the human brain.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Distinct mechanisms for panoramic and landmark-based view integration in human scene-selective cortex.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Distinct neural mechanisms for heading retrieval and context recognition in the hippocampus during spatial reorientation.

Nature communications·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 30, 2026

Using Pharmacological Manipulation and High-precision Radio Telemetry to Study the Spatial Cognition in Free-ranging Animals
08:28

Using Pharmacological Manipulation and High-precision Radio Telemetry to Study the Spatial Cognition in Free-ranging Animals

Published on: November 6, 2016

7.2K

Outside Looking In: Landmark Generalization in the Human Navigational System.

Steven A Marchette1, Lindsay K Vass2, Jack Ryan2

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104 stmar@sas.upenn.edu.

The Journal of Neuroscience : the Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience
|November 6, 2015
PubMed
Summary

The human brain recognizes landmarks using specialized areas. The parahippocampal place area (PPA) learns landmark identity, while the retrosplenial complex (RSC) retrieves associated information, and the occipital place area (OPA) processes visual features for navigation.

Keywords:
functional magnetic resonance imagingmultivoxel pattern analysisobject recognitionparahippocampal place arearetrosplenial complexspatial memory

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Effects of Mind-Body-Movement Practices on Brain Function
06:17

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Effects of Mind-Body-Movement Practices on Brain Function

Published on: January 26, 2024

2.8K
Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain
05:55

Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain

Published on: October 13, 2023

1.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 30, 2026

Using Pharmacological Manipulation and High-precision Radio Telemetry to Study the Spatial Cognition in Free-ranging Animals
08:28

Using Pharmacological Manipulation and High-precision Radio Telemetry to Study the Spatial Cognition in Free-ranging Animals

Published on: November 6, 2016

7.2K
Author Spotlight: Investigating the Effects of Mind-Body-Movement Practices on Brain Function
06:17

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Effects of Mind-Body-Movement Practices on Brain Function

Published on: January 26, 2024

2.8K
Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain
05:55

Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain

Published on: October 13, 2023

1.6K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Science
  • Spatial Navigation

Background:

  • Landmarks are crucial for spatial navigation, but the underlying neural mechanisms are not fully understood.
  • Previous research identifies scene- and building-selective regions in the brain, including the PPA, RSC, and OPA.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how the human brain codes landmarks using fMRI.
  • To elucidate the functional roles of the PPA, RSC, and OPA in landmark recognition and spatial memory.

Main Methods:

  • Multivoxel pattern analysis (MVPA) of fMRI data.
  • Subjects viewed interior and exterior views of campus buildings.
  • Analysis focused on activity patterns in response to familiar and unfamiliar landmark stimuli.

Main Results:

  • Similar activity patterns were observed in the PPA, RSC, and OPA for different views of the same building.
  • Generalization across landmark views depended on learned correspondences in the PPA.
  • Generalization relied on memory retrieval in the RSC and was independent of familiarity in the OPA.

Conclusions:

  • The PPA plays a key role in learning and recognizing landmark identity across different perceptual instantiations.
  • The RSC is involved in retrieving spatial or conceptual information associated with landmarks.
  • The OPA primarily processes visual features critical for landmark recognition, independent of familiarity.