Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

11.4K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.4K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

16.1K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
16.1K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

945
945
Errors In Hypothesis Tests01:14

Errors In Hypothesis Tests

6.3K
When performing a hypothesis test, there are four possible outcomes depending on the actual truth (or falseness) of the null hypothesis and the decision to reject or not.
6.3K
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

12.1K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
12.1K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

1.6K
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Association of gut microbiota with post-operative clinical course in Crohn's disease.

BMC gastroenterology·2013
Same author

Selection of primers for optimal taxonomic classification of environmental 16S rRNA gene sequences.

The ISME journal·2012
Same author

The coupling of alternative splicing and nonsense-mediated mRNA decay.

Advances in experimental medicine and biology·2008
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 30, 2026

An Open Source Technology Platform to Manufacture Hydrogel-Based 3D Culture Models in an Automated and Standardized Fashion
08:29

An Open Source Technology Platform to Manufacture Hydrogel-Based 3D Culture Models in an Automated and Standardized Fashion

Published on: March 31, 2022

5.0K

Rampant software errors may undermine scientific results.

David A W Soergel1

  • 1Department of Computer Science, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, USA ; Current address: Google, Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA.

F1000Research
|November 10, 2015
PubMed
Summary

Scientific results may be inaccurate due to undetected errors in computer software and data management. Expanded validation of scientific software and computed results is crucial for reliable research.

Keywords:
data managementsoftware error

More Related Videos

Detection of Targetable Alterations in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer using Next-generation Sequencing
05:17

Detection of Targetable Alterations in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer using Next-generation Sequencing

Published on: October 10, 2025

519
Using R, Seurat, and CellChat to Analyze a Single-Cell Transcriptomics Dataset of Mouse Skin Wound Healing
08:58

Using R, Seurat, and CellChat to Analyze a Single-Cell Transcriptomics Dataset of Mouse Skin Wound Healing

Published on: August 1, 2025

4.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 30, 2026

An Open Source Technology Platform to Manufacture Hydrogel-Based 3D Culture Models in an Automated and Standardized Fashion
08:29

An Open Source Technology Platform to Manufacture Hydrogel-Based 3D Culture Models in an Automated and Standardized Fashion

Published on: March 31, 2022

5.0K
Detection of Targetable Alterations in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer using Next-generation Sequencing
05:17

Detection of Targetable Alterations in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer using Next-generation Sequencing

Published on: October 10, 2025

519
Using R, Seurat, and CellChat to Analyze a Single-Cell Transcriptomics Dataset of Mouse Skin Wound Healing
08:58

Using R, Seurat, and CellChat to Analyze a Single-Cell Transcriptomics Dataset of Mouse Skin Wound Healing

Published on: August 1, 2025

4.0K

Area of Science:

  • Computer Science
  • Scientific Computing
  • Data Management

Background:

  • Software and data management are integral to modern scientific research.
  • Errors in these processes can be subtle, profound, and often go unnoticed.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the potential for widespread undetected errors in scientific results derived from computational processes.
  • To emphasize the need for enhanced validation of scientific software and computed data.

Main Methods:

  • Estimation of the potential for undetected errors in scientific results.
  • Analysis of the impact of software and data management on result accuracy.

Main Results:

  • A significant proportion of reported scientific results may be erroneous due to computational errors.
  • These errors are often difficult to detect through standard scientific review.

Conclusions:

  • There is a critical need to increase efforts in validating scientific software.
  • Robust validation of computed results is essential to ensure scientific integrity and reproducibility.