Oxidative phosphorylation-dependent regulation of cancer cell apoptosis in response to anticancer agents

N Yadav1, S Kumar1, T Marlowe1

  • 1Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA.

Cell Death & Disease
|November 6, 2015
PubMed

Insights

Certain anticancer drugs induce cancer cell death by targeting oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS), while others do not. This study reveals distinct OXPHOS-dependent and independent apoptosis pathways, offering new therapeutic strategies.

Area of Science:

  • Biochemistry
  • Cell Biology
  • Molecular Oncology

Background:

  • Cancer cells develop resistance to therapeutics through diverse mechanisms.
  • Understanding how anticancer agents induce apoptosis is crucial for effective cancer therapy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether various anticancer agents induce apoptosis via similar or distinct mechanisms.
  • To explore the role of oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) in mediating cancer cell death.

Main Methods:

  • Treatment of cancer cells with DNA-damaging agents (etoposide, doxorubicin), ER stressor (thapsigargin), histone deacetylase inhibitor (apicidin), staurosporine, taxol, and sorafenib.
  • Assessment of apoptosis induction, mitochondrial biogenesis, reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation, and mitochondrial unfolded protein response.
  • Genetic manipulation including abrogation of OXPHOS complexes (I, II) and p53-deficiency.
  • Analysis of caspase activation, cytochrome c, and apoptosis-inducing factor release.

Main Results:

  • DNA-damaging agents, thapsigargin, and apicidin induced apoptosis by targeting OXPHOS.
  • Staurosporine, taxol, and sorafenib induced apoptosis independently of OXPHOS.
  • DNA-damaging agents promoted mitochondrial biogenesis and ROS accumulation in a caspase-independent manner.
  • Abrogation of Complex-I blocked DNA-damage-induced apoptosis, while Complex-II inhibition did not.
  • Gross OXPHOS deficiencies led to both caspase-dependent and independent apoptosis.

Conclusions:

  • Anticancer agents exhibit differential targeting of OXPHOS for apoptosis induction.
  • OXPHOS-dependent and independent pathways represent distinct mechanisms of cancer cell death.
  • Findings suggest novel strategies for differential mitochondrial targeting in cancer therapy.

Related Concept Videos

Adaptive Mechanisms in Cancer Cells02:53

Adaptive Mechanisms in Cancer Cells

Cancer cells accumulate genetic changes at an abnormally rapid rate due to the defects in the DNA repair mechanisms. From an evolutionary perspective, such genetic instability is advantageous for cancer development. Mutant cell lines accumulate a series of beneficial mutations that contribute to their progression into cancer.
Some of the advantages that cancer cells have on normal cells include - enhanced ability to divide without terminally differentiating, induce new blood vessel formation,...
7.4K
Adaptive Mechanisms in Cancer Cells02:53

Adaptive Mechanisms in Cancer Cells

4.3K
The Intrinsic Apoptotic Pathway01:31

The Intrinsic Apoptotic Pathway

Internal cellular stress, such as cellular injury or hypoxia, triggers intrinsic apoptosis. The B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2) family of proteins are the primary regulators of the intrinsic apoptotic pathway. For example, during DNA damage, checkpoint proteins, such as Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated (ATM protein) and Checkpoints Factor-2 (Chk2) proteins, are activated. These proteins phosphorylate p53 which further activates pro-apoptotic proteins, such as Bax, Bak, PUMA, and Noxa, and inhibits...
9.2K
Electron Transport Chain: Complex I and II01:46

Electron Transport Chain: Complex I and II

The mitochondrial electron transport chain (ETC) is the main energy generation system in the eukaryotic cells. However, mitochondria also produce cytotoxic reactive oxygen species (ROS) due to the large electron flow during oxidative phosphorylation. While Complex I is one of the primary sources of superoxide radicals, ROS production by Complex II is uncommon and may only be observed in cancer cells with mutated complexes.
ROS generation is regulated and maintained at moderate levels necessary...
19.6K
Treatment Resistant Cancers02:56

Treatment Resistant Cancers

Cancer is the second leading cause of death in the United States. A cancer cell is genetically unstable and hence can mutate faster. They can also modify their microenvironment and escape immune surveillance. The difficulties in treating cancer are further compounded by the emergence of rapid resistance to anticancer drugs. The most common ways to attain resistance in cancer cells include alteration in drug transport and metabolism, modification of drug target, elevated DNA damage response, or...
3.9K
mTOR Signaling and Cancer Progression03:03

mTOR Signaling and Cancer Progression

The mammalian target of rapamycin or mTOR protein was discovered in 1994 due to its direct interaction with rapamycin. The protein gets its name from a yeast homolog called TOR. The mTOR protein complex in mammalian cells plays a major role in balancing anabolic processes such as the synthesis of proteins, lipids, and nucleotides and catabolic processes, such as autophagy in response to environmental cues, such as availability of nutrients and growth factors.
The mTOR pathway or the...
5.1K