Outcome after aortic valve replacement in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Jonathan R G Etnel1, Lisa C Elmont1, Ebru Ertekin1

  • 1Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Insights

Pediatric aortic valve replacement outcomes vary by procedure. The Ross procedure shows lower mortality than mechanical or homograft options, though reoperation rates need further study for all types.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Pediatric Cardiology
  • Medical Outcomes Research

Background:

  • Pediatric aortic valve replacement (AVR) is sometimes necessary despite interest in repair.
  • Evidence on outcomes after pediatric AVR is limited, often from small case series.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review and meta-analyze reported outcomes of pediatric patients following aortic valve replacement.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic literature search (1990-2015) for English publications on pediatric AVR.
  • Inclusion of studies with more than 30 patients.
  • Analysis of data from 34 publications (42 cohorts) on Ross procedure, mechanical prosthesis AVR, and homograft AVR.

Main Results:

  • The Ross procedure demonstrated lower early and late mortality compared to mechanical prosthesis and homograft AVR.
  • Aortic valve reoperation rates were similar for Ross and mechanical prosthesis AVR, but higher for homografts.
  • No studies on bioprostheses met inclusion criteria.

Conclusions:

  • Current aortic valve substitutes in children yield suboptimal results.
  • There is an urgent need for improved pediatric aortic valve repair techniques and innovative replacement solutions.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos