Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 30, 2026

Development and Evaluation of a Rat Model of Full-Thickness Cartilage Defects
Published on: May 19, 2023
Small-Diameter Awls Improve Articular Cartilage Repair After Microfracture Treatment in a Translational Animal Model
Patrick Orth1, Julia Duffner2, David Zurakowski3
1Center of Experimental Orthopaedics, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg, Germany.
Background:
Microfracture is the most commonly applied arthroscopic marrow stimulation procedure.
Hypothesis:
Articular cartilage repair is improved when the subchondral bone is perforated by small-diameter microfracture awls compared with larger awls.
Study Design:
Controlled laboratory study.
Methods:
Standardized rectangular (4 × 8 mm) full-thickness chondral defects (N = 24) were created in the medial femoral condyle of 16 adult sheep and debrided down to the subchondral bone plate. Three treatment groups (n = 8 defects each) were tested: 6 microfracture perforations using small-diameter awls (1.0 mm; group 1), large-diameter awls (1.2 mm; group 2), or without perforations (debridement control; group 3). Osteochondral repair was assessed at 6 months in vivo using established macroscopic, histological, immunohistochemical, biochemical, and micro-computed tomography analyses.
Results:
Compared with control defects, histological cartilage repair was always improved after both microfracture techniques (P < .023). Application of 1.0-mm microfracture awls led to a significantly improved histological overall repair tissue quality (7.02 ± 0.70 vs 9.03 ± 0.69; P = .008) and surface grading (1.05 ± 0.28 vs 2.10 ± 0.19; P = .001) compared with larger awls. The small-diameter awl decreased relative bone volume of the subarticular spongiosa (bone volume/tissue volume ratio: 23.81% ± 3.37% vs 30.58% ± 2.46%; P = .011). Subchondral bone cysts and intralesional osteophytes were frequently observed after either microfracture treatment. Macroscopic grading, DNA, proteoglycan, and type I and type II collagen contents as well as degenerative changes within the adjacent cartilage remained unaffected by the awl diameter.
Conclusion:
Small-diameter microfracture awls improve articular cartilage repair in the translational sheep model more effectively than do larger awls.
Clinical Relevance:
These data support the use of small microfracture instruments for the surgical treatment of cartilage defects and warrant prolonged clinical investigations.
More Related Videos
06:41A Minimally Invasive Model to Analyze Endochondral Fracture Healing in Mice Under Standardized Biomechanical Conditions
Published on: March 22, 2018
08:58Matrix-assisted Autologous Chondrocyte Transplantation for Remodeling and Repair of Chondral Defects in a Rabbit Model
Published on: May 21, 2013