Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 30, 2026

Multi-Tracer Studies of Brain Oxygen and Glucose Metabolism Using a Time-of-Flight Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography Scanner
Published on: June 7, 2024
Quantitative differences in [(18)F] NaF PET/CT: TOF versus non-TOF measurements
Jorge D Oldan1, Timothy G Turkington2, Kingshuk Choudhury3
1Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Duke University Medical Center Durham, NC, USA.
Time-of-flight (TOF) PET/CT imaging with [18F] sodium fluoride (NaF) shows higher standardized uptake value (SUV) in bone metastases and normal bone structures compared to non-TOF. These quantitative differences in NaF PET/CT scans are modest but important for clinical trials.
Area of Science:
- Nuclear Medicine
- Radiopharmaceuticals
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- [(18)F] sodium fluoride (NaF) PET/CT is a key method for detecting bone metastases.
- Time-of-flight (TOF) PET enhances image quality by reducing noise and improving resolution.
- Quantitative accuracy in standardized uptake value (SUV) measurements is crucial for treatment response assessment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantify and compare SUV differences between TOF and non-TOF [18F] NaF PET/CT reconstructions.
- To evaluate the impact of TOF on SUV measurements in various tissues and pathologies.
- To assess the clinical relevance of these quantitative differences in prostate cancer imaging.
Main Methods:
- 47 prostate cancer patients underwent [18F] NaF PET/CT scans.
- SUVmean and SUVmax were measured in normal soft tissues, osseous structures, degenerative changes, and metastases.
- TOF and non-TOF reconstructions were compared using paired t-tests and linear correlations.
Main Results:
- TOF reconstructions yielded higher SUVmean in all osseous structures (normal, degenerative, metastatic) compared to non-TOF.
- TOF showed lower SUVmean in normal soft tissues like liver, brain, and adipose tissue.
- Average SUVmean increased by 2.5% in metastases and 3.5% in degenerative joint disease with TOF, especially in smaller lesions.
Conclusions:
- TOF [18F] NaF PET/CT provides higher SUV values in bone lesions and normal bone, and lower values in soft tissue background.
- While statistically significant, the magnitude of SUV differences between TOF and non-TOF is modest.
- Consideration of TOF vs. non-TOF reconstruction differences is essential for accurate therapy response evaluation and multi-center trial design.
More Related Videos
06:31Quantitative [18F]-Naf-PET-MRI Analysis for the Evaluation of Dynamic Bone Turnover in a Patient with Facetogenic Low Back Pain
Published on: August 8, 2019
09:03Radiotracer Administration for High Temporal Resolution Positron Emission Tomography of the Human Brain: Application to FDG-fPET
Published on: October 22, 2019