Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 30, 2026

A Simple Stimulatory Device for Evoking Point-like Tactile Stimuli: A Searchlight for LFP to Spike Transitions
Published on: March 25, 2014
Beyond body mass: how prey traits improve predictions of functional response parameters
Ryan M Kalinoski1,2, John P DeLong3
1College of Arts and Sciences, University of St. Francis, Joliet, IL, 60453, USA.
Abstract:
Understanding the factors that determine the strength of predator-prey interactions is essential to understanding community structure and stability. Variation in the strength of predator-prey interactions often can be attributed to predator mass and prey mass, or abiotic factors like temperature. However, even when accounting for these factors, there remains a considerable amount of unexplained variation that may be attributed to other traits. We compiled functional response data from the literature to investigate how predator mass, prey mass, prey type (taxonomic identity), temperature, and prey defenses (hard vs soft integument) contributed to the variation found in the predator-prey interactions between freshwater cyclopoid copepods and their prey. Surprisingly, our results indicate that prey identity (taxonomic group) and defenses (hard vs soft integument) are more important for generating variation in interaction strengths than body mass and temperature. This suggests that allometric functions can only take us so far when attempting to better understand variation in individual predator prey interactions, and that we must evaluate how other traits influence interaction strengths. Identifying additional factors such as prey defenses may enable us to better predict potential changes in the structure and function of planktonic and other food webs by better accounting for the variation in the interactions between generalists and their many prey types.
Related Concept Videos
Dose-Response Relationship: Selectivity and Specificity
Dose-Response Relationship: Overview
Predator-Prey Interactions
Predicting Reaction Outcomes
Pharmacodynamic Models: Direct Effect Model and Indirect Response Model
Dose-Response Relationship: Potency and Efficacy

