Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 30, 2026

Differentiation and Characterization of Osteoclasts from Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
Published on: March 22, 2024
Topography Influences Adherent Cell Regulation of Osteoclastogenesis
M Nagasawa1, L F Cooper2, Y Ogino3
1Bone Biology and Implant Therapy Laboratory, School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA Division of Bio-prosthodontics, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Nigata, Japan.
This study investigated how the surface texture of titanium implants affects bone remodeling. Researchers found that bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) cultured on micro- and nanoscale titanium surfaces increased production of factors that promote osteoclast formation. These BMSCs also influenced macrophages to become osteoclasts more readily when exposed to their conditioned media. The effect was mediated by a heat-sensitive substance in the media. The findings suggest that implant surface topography can modulate BMSC signaling and indirectly regulate osteoclast activity at the implant-bone interface. This could help guide the design of implants that better control bone resorption and osseointegration.
Area of Science:
- Biomaterials in regenerative medicine
- Osteoclast biology in bone remodeling
- Cellular response to implant surface topography
Background:
The role of osteoclasts in osseointegration remains underexplored. While bone resorption is known to occur during bone remodeling, its regulation by implant-adherent cells is less understood. Prior research has shown that bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) secrete factors that influence osteoclast formation. However, the impact of surface topography on these interactions has not been fully characterized. Established knowledge includes the role of RANKL and M-CSF in osteoclastogenesis. This paper addresses a gap in understanding how surface features affect BMSC signaling and, consequently, osteoclast activity. No prior work had resolved how micro- and nanoscale topographies alter BMSC secretory profiles. This study investigates whether titanium surface topography influences BMSC-derived signals that regulate osteoclast formation. The findings may clarify how implant surfaces modulate bone remodeling at the interface.
Purpose Of The Study:
The aim of this study was to determine if titanium surface topography affects BMSC signaling and osteoclastogenesis. The specific problem addressed is the lack of understanding about how surface features influence BMSC-derived factors that regulate osteoclast formation. The motivation stems from the need to improve osseointegration outcomes by controlling local bone resorption. The study tests the hypothesis that BMSCs cultured on different titanium surfaces alter osteoclast-promoting gene expression. The researchers focused on soluble RANKL, osteoprotegerin, tumor necrosis factor α, and M-CSF as key mediators. The study also examines whether BMSC-conditioned media from different surfaces can influence macrophage differentiation into osteoclasts. The goal is to identify how surface topography modulates BMSC behavior and downstream osteoclast activity. This could inform the design of implant surfaces that regulate bone remodeling.
Main Methods:
The study used cell culture to assess the effect of titanium surface topography on BMSC function. BMSCs were isolated from rat femurs and tibias and cultured on four surfaces: smooth, micro, nano, and tissue culture plastic. Some cultures included osteogenic supplements. After 3 to 14 days, conditioned media were collected. Rat bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMMs) were cultured in media supplemented with RANKL and M-CSF, along with BMSC-conditioned media from each surface. Gene expression levels of RANKL, osteoprotegerin, tumor necrosis factor α, and M-CSF were measured via real-time PCR. Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase staining was used to quantify osteoclast formation. Statistical analysis included ANOVA and t tests. The study also tested whether the osteoclast-promoting effect of BMSC-conditioned media was heat-labile. This approach allowed the researchers to link surface topography to changes in BMSC signaling and osteoclastogenesis.
Main Results:
BMSCs cultured on micro- and nanoscale titanium surfaces showed increased expression of tumor necrosis factor α (P < 0.01) and M-CSF (P < 0.01) compared to other surfaces. These factors are known to promote osteoclast formation. BMSC-conditioned media from micro- and nanoscale surfaces increased osteoclast numbers in BMM cultures (P < 0.01). The effect was mediated by a heat-labile factor in the conditioned media. The study found that surface topography altered BMSC phenotype and signaling. Micro- and nanoscale surfaces enhanced osteoclast-promoting gene expression. The conditioned media from these surfaces supported greater osteoclast differentiation than others. These findings suggest that surface topography modulates BMSC-derived signals that influence osteoclastogenesis.
Conclusions:
The authors propose that surface topography alters BMSC phenotype and signaling. This change in BMSC function may indirectly regulate osteoclastogenesis at the implant-bone interface. The study suggests that micro- and nanoscale titanium surfaces increase the expression of tumor necrosis factor α and M-CSF in BMSCs. These factors promote osteoclast formation in co-cultured macrophages. The researchers propose that the heat-labile factor in BMSC-conditioned media is responsible for this effect. The findings support the idea that implant surface topography influences local bone remodeling. The authors suggest that BMSCs on specific surfaces may enhance osteoclastogenesis through secreted factors. These conclusions are based on the observed changes in gene expression and osteoclast numbers.
Frequently Asked Questions
BMSCs cultured on micro- and nanoscale titanium surfaces increased tumor necrosis factor α and M-CSF expression, which promoted osteoclastogenesis in co-cultured macrophages.
BMSC-conditioned media from micro- and nanoscale surfaces increased osteoclast numbers in BMM cultures, suggesting a heat-labile factor mediates this effect.
These surfaces were selected to investigate how topography influences BMSC signaling and downstream osteoclast activity in the context of osseointegration.
These factors are key osteoclast-promoting signals. Their increased expression on micro- and nanoscale surfaces correlates with higher osteoclast numbers.
Osteoclast formation was quantified using tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase staining of cultured macrophages.
The findings suggest that implant surface topography can modulate BMSC signaling and influence osteoclast activity at the implant-bone interface.
Related Concept Videos
Osteoclasts in Bone Remodeling
Bone Cells and Tissue
Osteoblasts and Osteocytes
The osteoblast is the bone cell responsible for forming new bone tissue. It is found in the growing portions of bone, including the...
Bone Remodeling
Hormones and Bone Tissue
Hormones That Influence Osteoblasts and/or Maintain the Matrix
Several hormones are necessary for controlling bone growth and maintaining the bone matrix. The pituitary gland secretes growth hormone (GH), which, as its name implies, controls bone growth. This happens in several ways: first, it triggers chondrocyte...
Cadherins in Tissue Organization
Cell Sorting During Development
Cell sorting plays an...
Skeleton and Calcium Homeostasis

