Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Hardy-Weinberg Principle

Hardy-Weinberg Principle

Diploid organisms have two alleles of each gene, one from each parent, in their somatic cells. Therefore, each individual contributes two alleles to the gene pool of the population. The gene pool of a population is the sum of every allele of all genes within that population and has some degree of variation. Genetic variation is typically expressed as a relative frequency, which is the percentage of the total population that has a given allele, genotype or phenotype.

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...

Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?

Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?

The genomes of eukaryotes are punctuated by long stretches of sequence which do not code for proteins or RNAs. Although some of these regions do contain crucial regulatory sequences, the vast majority of this DNA serves no known function. Typically, these regions of the genome are the ones in which the fastest change, in evolutionary terms, is observed, because there is typically little to no selection pressure acting on these regions to preserve their sequences.
In contrast, regions which code...

Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?

Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?

The Evidence for Evolution

The Evidence for Evolution

Genetic variations accumulating within populations over generations give rise to biological evolution. Evolutionary changes can result in the formation of novel varieties and entire new species. These changes are responsible for the diverse forms of life inhabiting the planet. The evidence for evolution suggests that all living organisms descended from common ancestors.

Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift

Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift

In a population that is not at Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, the frequency of alleles changes over time. Therefore, any deviations from the five conditions of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium can alter the genetic variation of a given population. Conditions that change the genetic variability of a population include mutations, natural selection, non-random mating, gene flow, and genetic drift (small population size).

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Generating Heterogeneous Data on Gene Trees.

Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology·2025

Same author

Designing Weights for Quartet-Based Methods When Data are Heterogeneous Across Lineages.

Bulletin of mathematical biology·2023

Same author

SAQ: Semi-Algebraic Quartet Reconstruction.

IEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics·2021

Same author

Embeddability and rate identifiability of Kimura 2-parameter matrices.

Journal of mathematical biology·2019

Same author

Algebraic Methods in Phylogenetics.

Bulletin of mathematical biology·2018

Same author

Embeddability of Kimura 3ST Markov matrices.

Journal of theoretical biology·2018

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 30, 2026

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Published on: February 3, 2023

Invariant Versus Classical Quartet Inference When Evolution is Heterogeneous Across Sites and Lineages.

Jesús Fernández-Sánchez¹, Marta Casanellas²

¹Department of Mathematics, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.

Systematic Biology

|November 13, 2015

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new phylogenetic reconstruction method using phylogenetic invariants. It accurately infers evolutionary trees, outperforming classical methods when substitution models are inappropriate.

Keywords:

General Markov model heterogeneity across lineages heterogeneity across sites phylogenetic invariants topology reconstruction yeast

More Related Videos

Heuristic Mining of Hierarchical Genotypes and Accessory Genome Loci in Bacterial Populations

Heuristic Mining of Hierarchical Genotypes and Accessory Genome Loci in Bacterial Populations

Published on: December 7, 2021

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts

Published on: February 5, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 30, 2026

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Published on: February 3, 2023

Heuristic Mining of Hierarchical Genotypes and Accessory Genome Loci in Bacterial Populations

Heuristic Mining of Hierarchical Genotypes and Accessory Genome Loci in Bacterial Populations

Published on: December 7, 2021

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts

Published on: February 5, 2014

Area of Science:

Computational Biology
Phylogenetics
Molecular Evolution

Background:

Classical phylogenetic methods often fail due to oversimplified models.
Accurate inference of evolutionary relationships is crucial for understanding biodiversity and disease.

Purpose of the Study:

To propose a novel quartet reconstruction method using phylogenetic invariants.
To develop a method compatible with the most general Markov model of nucleotide substitution.
To handle data from mixtures on the same topology.

Main Methods:

Utilized phylogenetic invariants for quartet reconstruction.
Developed a system of weights for quartet-based methods.
Evaluated performance on real and simulated 4-taxon data under various conditions (time-homogeneous/nonhomogeneous, rate heterogeneity, branch lengths).
Compared against Neighbor-Joining, Maximum Likelihood, and Maximum Parsimony.

Main Results:

The proposed method demonstrates accuracy and robustness.
It performs comparably to Maximum Likelihood when model assumptions align.
It outperforms other methods when substitution models are inappropriate.
It shows superior performance even when some assumptions are violated, given sufficient data length.

Conclusions:

The proposed phylogenetic reconstruction method offers a robust and accurate alternative to classical approaches.
It is particularly advantageous when dealing with complex evolutionary models and data heterogeneity.
This method enhances the reliability of inferring evolutionary topologies.