Comparison of Clinical and Radiological Improvement Between the Modified Trephine and High-speed Drill as Main...

High-speed drill is the main osteotomy instrument in pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) currently. Considering the long duration of surgery, the large amount of blood loss, and the high incidence of neurovascular injury, the osteotomy procedure is challenging. Use of trephine for the osteotomy displays high efficiency by shortening surgery time and reducing blood loss in anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion. However, the potential risk of neurological injury is high. We modified the trephine by adding locking instrument, when the serrated top of the trephine reaches the tip of the probe; the locking instrument on the probe restricts the trephine and improves security during the osteotomy procedure.The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological improvement between the modified trephine and high-speed drill as main osteotomy instrument in PSO.From February 2009 to 2013, 50 patients with severe thoracolumbar kyphotic deformity caused by old compressive vertebrae were prospectively reviewed. All patients were randomly assigned to the experimental group (27 patients received PSO with modified trephine) and the control group (23 patients received PSO with high-speed drill). The clinical records were reviewed and compared for surgical time, operative blood loss, functional improvement (Oswestry Disability Index), and pain relief (visual analog scale). The radiological records were reviewed and compared for correction of kyphotic deformity postoperatively and correction loss at 2-year follow-up.All patients successfully finished the PSO procedure, and got satisfactory kyphotic deformity correction and overall function improvement. The surgery time was shorter in the experimental group than that in the control group (132.7 ± 12.6 vs 141.7 ± 16.7 min; P = 0.03). No significant difference was found in blood loss (882.9 ± 98.9 mL vs 902.2 ± 84.9 mL; P = 0.47) or correction of the kyphotic angle (33.4 ± 3.4° vs 32.1 ± 2.5°, P = 0.13) postoperatively between the 2 groups. At 24-month follow-up, no difference was discovered in loss of the correction (4.9 ± 1.6° vs 4.5 ± 1.6°; P = 0.42), change of Oswestry Disability Index (49.4 ± 6.2% vs 48.2 ± 4.2%; P = 0.44), or in back pain relief (6.2 ± 1.4 vs 6.4 ± 1.2 min; P = 0.51) between the 2 groups. No internal fixation related complication occurred and bony fusion was detected in lateral X-ray in all patients. In the control group, 2 patients had transient nerve root deficit, 14 patients at 3-month follow-up and 3 patients at 2-year follow-up experienced graft donor site morbidity, and pain killer medicine was always required.In conclusion, the modified trephine obviously shortens surgery time, and prevents graft donor site morbidity when compared to a high-speed drill. The learning curve for using the modified trephine in PSO procedure is short.